[AMRadio] Usages of AM in the amateur context

[Jim in Waco WB5OXQ]

I can work anywhere but my receiver is too broad to separate a 5kc spread on 
am.  If I choose the narrow filter the audio is too mushy for good copy on 
am.  Perhaps those of us with vfo can move to 3.885.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Raper" <kj4hyd at gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" 
<amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Usages of AM in the amateur context


>
> On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Jim in Waco WB5OXQ wrote:
>
>> I spend 2 hours last night on 3.880 AM talking with Ken KA5RHK in 
>> Arkansas
>> and we paused many times hoping for others to join in with no takers.
>> Where is everybody.
>
> I am Rock-Bound on 3885 for my main rig.
>
> 73,
> Kevin Raper
> KJ4HYD
> CE WCKI WQIZ
>
> There is no limitation to the fidelity of AM radio. From a mathematical 
> standpoint, AM does better in frequency response than FM. - Leonard Kahn
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.856 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3163 - Release Date: 09/27/10 
12:56:00