[AMRadio] WTAG 580 IBOC off for the 2nd day in a row

[BILL GUYGER]

Hi Rob

I'd kill for a DX-25, the DX series just seems to work. We have two DX-10's and 
no problems what so ever. I got one of the exec's at Harris to admit on a 
conference call that the DX series were better transmitters than the 3DX. He 
actually admitted that the whole reason for the 3DX's was cost cutting. They did 
things like take the big Vacuum Variable out of the PA and approximate the 
ideal value for different frequencies with multiple paralleled Mica's




________________________________
From: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo at gmail.com>
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 3:10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] WTAG 580 IBOC off for the 2nd day in a row

Ah Bill, so you wound up with the DX after all.  Sorry to hear it.

Around here the WCCO night time IBOC on 830 kills the local 820
station at night which is down to 1.5 KW and a six tower DA to protect
WBAP.  I really hate medium wave IBOC.  The night 670 IBOC which is
only about 10 miles away (the former WMAQ) destroys my reception of
WSM.  I could go on with other examples.

Rob
K5UJ

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:53 PM, BILL GUYGER <bguyger at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>  It's a Harris 3DX-50 masquerading as a 25. I was campaining for a Nautel 
NX-25
> but apparently the company has an agreement with Harris.
>
______________________________________________________________
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Post: AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-request at mailman.qth.net with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html