[AMRadio] Cabinet for the T-368 exciter?
D. Chester
k4kyv at charter.net
Wed Mar 25 16:35:30 EDT 2009
Probably the best bet is to make one. I modified one and use it as my
station VFO, capable of driving any of my rigs.
I still found the drift objectionable when the PTO is turned off during
stand-by, particularly when working 40m CW, so I modified mine to let the
oscillator run all the time even when the rest of the unit is turned off.
The problem with doing that is that the oscillator is audible in the
receiver, which can be a problem with weak signals when the band is quiet.
I built a metal shielded enclosure to encase the whole thing, PTO,
buffer/multiplier unit and all. I used about 1/16" sheet aluminium and some
1/4" square rods of aluminium stock salvaged from something long forgotten.
I cut side and top panels, using the original bottom cover, rear panel and
front sub-panel behind the mechanical dial assembly. I carefully drilled
and tapped holes for 4-40 screws, using the square stock as a skeleton to
hold the sheet metal panels together at the corners. The front and rear
sub-panels in the unit are thick enough that I was able to drill and tap
directly into the edges, without the square stock. I used standard circuits
for TVI filtering and bypassing for all power supply, filament and control
leads going in and out of the unit, except that the inductances and
capacitances were optimised for the 1.5-20 mHz range instead of for VHF. I
was able to reduce the rf feed-through to the receiver to negligible with
the receiving antenna connected, although it is faintly audible when the
antenna is removed from the receiver.
I replaced the type 6000 tube with a 6AG7. I had to re-wire the octal tube
socket, but the capacitances of the two tubes are nearly the same. I put
only about 150 volts on the 6AG7, and that gives me about 200-250 milliwatts
of power out, which is comparable to the output from a ham type VFO like the
Johnson 122 or Heathkit VF-1.
The next problem was coupling the output to the transmitters. In the
original T-368 setup, a short length of coax is used to directly couple the
plate of the output to the grid of the final amplifier, and its
capacitance was not enough to cause a problem with resonance at the output
coil. Some of my rigs are as far as 10' away from the operating table, and
that much coax loads down the output circuit with too much capacitance, and
the alignment parameters changed with different lengths of coax to the
different rigs. So I decided to make mine link coupled. I salvaged a
spare bandswitch wafer from a T-195 multiplier/buffer unit I had on hand,
which is very similar to the one in the T-368. I disassemble the
bandswitch, cut two of the hollow tubes used as spacers between wafers to
accomodate the additional wafer, and re-assembled the bandswitch. I then
took out the output coils and removed the shields, then wound a coupling
coil over the cold end of each coil and brought the new lead out the bottom
of the coil. I don't recall if there was already an extra banana plug at
the coil bases, or if I added one or simply brought the wire out through a
hole (I made these mods about 20 years ago). The new wafer section was used
to select the coupling coil. As I recall, I used about 2 turns for the
highest frequency coil, 4 for the next, 8 for the 3-6 mHz coil and 16 for
the 1.6-3 mHz coil. I removed the original BNC connector and relay at the
top of the buffer assembly, and relocated the BNC to the rear of the unit as
the output jack. With the modified output, I can get about 1/4 watt of rf
into a 50-ohm dummy load.
Before the mod, the unit would track perfectly over each one of the tuning
ranges. I was amazed that I could put an RF voltmeter at the output and it
would show a constant reading no matter what band or frequency I tuned it
to. Adding the coupling links somewhat screwed up the linearity, and I
could never get the ranges to track as well as they did before the
modification. I possibly could have experimented with the exact number of
turns of coupling coil on each output coil, and been able to get the unit to
track perfectly over each frequency range, but I didn't go to the trouble,
since I use each frequency output range of the unit for only one ham band:
1.5-3 for 160, 3-6 for 75/80, 6-12 for 40m, and 12-20 for 20m. I found
that I could align the output coils well enough that the unit would still
track perfectly across the entire ham band in each frequency range, but the
output would fall off at the extreme ends. Since I don't do pirate
broadcasting on shortwave and have no use for frequencies outside the ham
bands, the tracking error made zero difference to me, so I didn't bother. I
haven't tried using it on 30m or 17m, but hopefully I would still be able to
get enough output on those bands to drive whatever transmitter I might use.
The final modification was to add a Jackson Brothers planetary dial drive to
the tuning knob, because the stock tuning rate was too fast on the higher
frequencies. The reduction drive magnifies the small amount of backlash in
the tuning mechanism, but it still allows for more precise tuning to
zero-beat a signal, particularly on 40m, than with the tuning knob running
straight through.
Using a drill press, I drilled a large number of holes in the top panel of
the sheild I added, in a pattern that places ventilation holes above each
tube, to reduce temperature build-up inside the unit and possible warm-up
drift. I used a small drill, something around a size #48, to make the
ventilation holes.
Don k4kyv
More information about the AMRadio
mailing list