[AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306

[peter markavage]

Jim wrote: "RM 11305 simply opens the bands to all modes, it does not
widen the present 
modes due to a rule change.  The current rules would still be enforced"

What rules are you referring to?

Pete, wa2cwa

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:28:49 -0600 "Jim Wilhite" <w5jo at brightok.net>
writes:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "peter markavage"
> >
> > Cause they're wider, and with RM-11305, there are no bounds to
> > "wideness". If you think you have QRM now, can you picture in the 
> future,
> > AM, SSB, FM, CW, digital voice/data/multimedia, SSTV, maybe even a 
> form
> > of ATV, etc. all trying to operate adjacent to each other on the 
> bands.
> 
> RM 11305 simply opens the bands to all modes, it does not widen the 
> present 
> modes due to a rule change.  The current rules would still be 
> enforced. 
> Sure some violate that, in fact I am considered by some near me in 5 
> land to 
> be an ogre because there are some stations that are splattering and 
> I 
> pointed it out after trying to resolve it with the offending 
> stations.  Now 
> everyone in the group is looking at their signals and the offenders 
> are 
> under pressure by many to reform.
> >
> > :"would make more of us gentlemen"  - I guess by osmosis. I see no 
> other
> > way it could happen. Of course then, why doesn't it currently 
> happen on
> > the bands today. Why would any mode, any bandwidth, anywhere, all 
> of a
> > sudden, make amateurs nicer than they are today??
> 
> 
> See above answer
> 
> >
> > :"Mode or bandwidth restrictions simply promote special interest 
> groups"
> > - AM, SSB, CW, digital, SSTV, etc. etc. operations are all 
> special
> > interest groups that form the backbone of the amateur radio 
> service. Some
> > are just larger than others.
> >
> > Pete,
> 
> 
> Yes they are Pete, why not give them additional room to operate?
> 
> 73  Jim
> W5JO