[AMRadio] League Bandwidth petition - final tally

[W2AGN]

Brian Carling wrote:
> On 23 Feb 2006 at 9:47, UVCM INC wrote:
> 
> 
>>Ron,
>>I have experience in politics and running companies, would like to chat with
>>you about legal action, sometimes its the only way. or maybe their are other
>>ways if the ARRL would listen to us and modify there position.
>>Brad KB7FQR
> 
> 
> Brad don't hold your breath to see THAT happen...
> The ARRL Directors and top brass have demonstrated 
> an incredible level of intransigence,  and treachery against 
> the clearly communicated will of the majority of radio amateurs.
> 
> They have dug in to this amazingly stupid position for some 
> time now. I don't expect them to change one bit. The fact of the
> matter is that ARRL is broken! We need something else with 
> some integrity to replace ARRL, or at least to become a 
> viable alternative until such time as we amateurs who still 
> love and value the hobby can see this obsolete, self-perpetuating
> old boys' club deposed.
> 
> I know many are still holding out hope that the League can be 
> reformed.
> All I see is that it gets worse and worse all the time.
> ______________________________________________________________
> AMR
> 

Absolutely correct. I strongly object to them dubbing themselves "The National 
Organization for Amateur Radio." The membership is a small percentage of Amateur 
Radio, and the3y represent only a small percentage of that.( Mainly Winlink users).

-- 
    _     _     _     _     _
   / \   / \   / \   / \   / \   John L. Sielke
  ( W ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( G ) ( N )  http://w2agn.net
   \_/   \_/   \_/   \_/   \_/
"CRUSTY OLD CURMUDGEON - AND PROUD OF IT!"