[AMRadio] WW II Army Field Sets
W7QHO at aol.com
W7QHO at aol.com
Sat Jul 10 01:05:53 EDT 2004
In a message dated 7/9/04 8:35:38 PM, Kim.Elmore at noaa.gov writes:
> Given the st-up I've created, the SCR-188 would work FB :) So, do you (or
> anyone else) know what would be involved in tweaking the BC-191/BC-312 (or
> the JT-350A) combination to work on 20 m? Is this something a guy back
> then, with a bit of time, could do, or does the BC-191 design simply
> preclude such a conversion?
>
KIM,
The BC-191 tuning units went up to 12.5 mHz. Would be possible to strip a
few turns off some of the coils to get to 20M, I guess, but the things are too
unstable and drifty to be acceptable for ham use above 75M. No problem with
the BC-312, though. This was the Army's general field use HF receiver of the
time and it operates up to 18 mHz. Ran off 12 vdc except for a couple of
later 24 volt models. The BC-342 was the 117 vac version.
Does it have to be an Army field set? The Army Air Corps was using the
ART-13 in their B-29s in 1944. Excellent 100W transmitter that covered 2 - 18
mHz in it's basic form. (Would actually tune down to about 1.98 mHz so covered
a piece of 160M too.) Originally a Navy development. Maybe you could have
your character "liberate" one of these from the flyboys, pick one out of a
crashed aircraft, etc. Normally paired with the BC-348 receiver in the planes
but a BC-312/342 would work along side it just fine.
Dennis D. W7QHO
Glendale, CA
More information about the AMRadio
mailing list