[AMRadio] The PROPOSED ARRL Suggestions to FCC
Jim Isbell
millenniumfalcon at cableone.net
Thu Jan 22 17:09:47 EST 2004
Tommye & Jim Wilhite wrote:
> I can also see that the code was a filter that prevented some
>undesirables from applying. I hate the fact that I had to work harder than
>some new person that does not have to know the code to gain the privileges.
>
>
>
Realizing that we are both on the same side on this, I want to comment
ONLY on this portion of what was said. This is the old, "If I was
hazed, then by God, I will haze the new comers to the group" Yes, if
they eliminate code then others will get it "cheaper" than I did, but to
make that a reason to oppose it is just to support the act of "Hazing"
unless it can be shown that learning code will increase the technical
ability of an applicant. But I doubt that that can be done. In fact I
would be willing to bet that a chimpanzee could be taught code at 5
WPM!!! And I would be just as willing to bet that you could NOT teach a
chimp to read a single schematic and build a circuit.
More information about the AMRadio
mailing list