[AMRadio] Re: Modulation transformer ID and repair
Brett Gazdzinski
brett.gazdzinski at mci.com
Wed Nov 26 21:11:52 EST 2003
Don,
I don't get into the negative cycle loading much, its
more of a protection device, to prevent splatter and so on.
I think anything that changes the input waveform is distortion.
I do run some compression, to compensate for moving around while
talking.
The mike preamp does limit the peaks (one of those berringer things),
but not much.
Brett
N2DTS
>
> >I limit my quick peaks in the mike preamp, and include negative
> >cycle loading in all RF decks, but don't push things much.
>
> I don't use negative cycle loading or ultramodulation, but I do take
> advantage of the natural asymmetry of the human voice. Mine
> tends to run
> about 135% positive when I limit the negative to 100%. The
> ratio would be
> more like 2:1 if I clipped off a few excessive negative
> peaks. I usually run
> about 640 watts DC input to the final. Considering the
> losses in the PA
> tank circuit, the matching network at the transmitter output,
> the feedline
> between the shack and the tower site, and the remote antenna
> tuner at the
> base of the tower, I'd be surprised if I'm getting as much
> as 400 watts
> carrier output to the antenna. When I talk, the modulatior
> plate meters
> just barely wiggle beyond static plate current, unless I
> whistle or make a
> sustained tone. With a sinewave signal from a generator I
> can make each
> modulator tube draw up to 400 ma! The only "processing" I use is the
> Universal Audio/Urei Model BL-40 Modulimiter (the only
> solid-state device in
> the station except for the homebrew cw keyer).
>
>
> >There are people on the band who run/can run excessive positive
> >modulation, but you need a special detector I guess, because
> they sound
> >bad in my shack when they do.
>
> I just make sure there is no flat-topping on positive peaks
> or bright spots
> on the baseline in the negative direction. I once tried
> ultramodulation,
> but I think I gained much more distortion than talk power.
> Most reports
> indicated the audio was no louder, but had a scratchy sound.
> The most
> effective thing I ever tried for "talk power" was high level
> symmetrical
> speech clipping back in the 60's, but it added audible
> distortion, and I
> went through about half a dozen modulation transformers in
> about as many
> months, ranging in ratings from 500 to 2000 watts. After I
> abandoned the
> high level clipping, I havn't lost a single modulation
> transformer since.
>
> Don K4KYV
>
More information about the AMRadio
mailing list