[AMRadio] Audio response and Long distant QSO's (was: Suggestions Please)

[k0ng at inebraska.com]

Hello Jeff:  Nice to hear from you.My website has the replys mixed up so
I hope this dosnt go world wide, HI. Will look forward to working you again
especially on 160 this winter (?) 73 for now. DE Charlie, K0NG


Quoting "Jeffrey J. May" <jeffreymay at worldnet.att.net>:

> Hi Charlie,
>   I am now living in SW Miss..about 130 miles NE of New Orleans...hope all
> is well with you..73..Jeff..W0XV..ex W0ONM
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <k0ng at inebraska.com>
> To: <amradio at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Audio response and Long distant QSO's (was:
> Suggestions Please)
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >   Jeff: You are too logical!! Wideband for strong signals, narrowband for
> >         weak signals. Almost all AM signals in Nebraska are weak so I
> >         guess that makes me "narrow minded". By the way, there are several
> >         systems that automatically adjust either audio or IF bandwidth
> >         depending upon signal strength (AVC) or signal to noise ratio.
> >         I have used both until DSP came along. Good luck in your
> discussion.
> >
> >         73 DE Charlie, K0NG
> >
> > Quoting Jeff Edmonson <w5omr at w5omr.shacknet.nu>:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > : If you have to ask, then you are probably using too much.  If you are
> > > : listening, you probably aren't using enough.  If all you think about
> is
> > > : comparing AM to SSB, then you are just looking for a silly argument.
> > >
> > > Trust me, Bill, this is not someone "trolling" for a fight in a group.
> > >
> > > I'm serious when I ask, though - what's the purpose of trying to run
> > > audio, starting at 50Hz, on a noisy HF band like 160, 75 or 40m?
> > >
> > > honestly, from across the nation, those transmitters who have that much
> > > low-end response are the same people who want that low-end response
> > > enhanced, and in periods of QRM/QRN and selective fade, it's more of
> > > a determent to be able to copy, than an enjoyable, enhanced audio
> > > performance.  I'm absolutely sure that the later is the goal intended,
> but
> > > for talking cross-country on noisy bands, SORRY!, it's just not gonna
> > > happen.
> > >
> > > Now, it's possible to have GREAT audio and still filter and tailor the
> > > audio so that it's not out of the passband, such as that of Don Chester,
> > > K4KYV.  I'm hoping that Don can come in here, and remind me how it
> is/was
> > > he was peaking the audio at around 3kc, and then rolling the whole thing
> > > off at 3.5kc (or slightly higher).  And, what's the bottom end?
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > AMRadio mailing list
> > > AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> AMRadio at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
>