I gave up on 60M a long time ago.  It was the "center channel" thing that got me.  I have a Yaesu rig that was the only one I could use on FT8.  It operated only on pre-programmed frequencies on 60M.  I could not get it to transmit on a legal frequency.  I don't remember well, but I think the displayed frequency on 60 was the center of the 3 Khz audio channel rather than the carrier frequency.  Maybe it was legal after all and I just didn't understand why they showed the frequency that way.   I resorted to using a Kenwood rig to listen to the transmitted signal from the Yaesu to see where it really was.  The only reason for thinking about it was that I had worked a VP6 on Pitcairn on every possible band/mode slot except 60M FT8 (and maybe 75 SSB).  I gave up. 

Also, I think the FCC allows digital and CW signals, but they must be right in the center of the 3 Khz allocated channel.  FT8 doesn't normally work that way, but people seem to spread out like normal.  Also, CW offsets mean even that would be tricky. 

I can operate there on SSB if needed for an emergency.  That's good enough for me for now. 

Dennis/RZ

On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 3:39 PM <w5znjoel@gmail.com> wrote:

It is a bit confusing, Randy.

 

The USA was the very first country to ever have a 5 MHz allocation for the amateur radio service. The ARRL worked very hard to make this happen back around 2001 to 2004. It was proposed as a secondary allocation to provide a “propagation bridge” between 80 and 40 meters for emergency communications efforts. The FCC was all on board but it took quite a bit of political maneuvering to get the by in from the NTIA (state dept and DoD) since they are the primary allocated service. We reached an agreement for five discreet fixed frequencies with a 100 W ERP power limit.

 

The reason 60 meters is not accepted for DXCC credit is the original basis for the secondary allocation – emergency communications, not contesting or DX chasing! At that time, to allow such would have caused us to lose access to 5 MHz.

 

After a while a few other countries thought our access to 5 MHz was was pretty slick so they petitioned their national regulator for a piece of the band, mirroring the USA frequencies. It became so popular a movement started within the ITU to allocate a slice of spectrum, not fixed frequencies, to the amateur service on a secondary basis. At WRC19 that became a reality, but not with a cost. It is a very narrow segment and a very low (almost QRP level) power restriction. By the way, the United States administration did NOT support this!! But the IARU had enough clot with other country administrations to push it through.

 

Following the WRC19 allocation other countries petitioned their national regulator for access to the new spectrum and were granted. That is where the confusion on 60 meters began. Those countries could operate in the new segment but the USA’s regulator, the FCC, had not adopted the WRC19 allocation so we were stuck. ARRL did their duty and petitioned the FCC for access to the new allocation and that is where the stalemate started. ARRL wanted access to the new allocation and to also retain access to the five fixed frequencies. FCC wanted to move amateur radio to the new allocation and drop the fix fixed frequencies (and the 100 W power level they had).

 

That’s where we stand today, and when hams see hams in other countries operating in the new segment they don’t stop the confirm whether we have access or not.

 

Hopefully something will happen at the FCC in the (near?) future!

 

73 Joel W5ZN

www.w5zn.org

 

From: adxa-bounces@mailman.qth.net <adxa-bounces@mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Randell Curtis, W5ZJ via ADXA
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 11:08 AM
To: w5znjoel@gmail.com
Cc: adxa@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [ADXA] VP2VI 60 Meter CW

 

Thanks so much! I would have definitely been one of the illegal ones if I hadn’t had difficulty with the plug into the Icom. Sometimes the Good Lord takes care of the ignorant. 

 

Randy/W5ZJ

On Mon, 14 Apr, 2025 at 10:08 AM, w5znjoel@gmail.com <w5znjoel@gmail.com> wrote:

Just a reminder to the ADXA folks about VP2VI and 60 meter CW. Last night when they were on CW, they were transmitting on a frequency NOT authorized for USA and lsning on a frequency NOT authorized in the USA to transmit on. There was a brief period where they did lsn on 5348 KHz where USA can transmit, but only for a very brief period.

 

So, PLEASE do NOT transmit outside of the five discreet fixed frequencies authorized in the USA (like some USA stations were doing last night)! That is a clear FCC regulatory violation. Hopefully in the near future the FCC will authorize US hams access to the new 60 meter allocation authorized at WRC19, but the standoff now is the FCC wants to eliminate the five discreet channels to give us access to the 15 KHz or so bandwidth. The ARRL wants (and I fully support the ARRL position) is we should be granted access to the new allocation and retain the five discreet frequency channels.

 

73 Joel W5ZN

www.w5zn.org

 

 

______________________________________________________________
ADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ADXA@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html