Interesting.  He was not running SF.  And, his stats in club log include nothing on 80 or 160.  I was wondering about that too.  But, WFWL.  Band was very noisy and the signal was very weak.  I'm not sure how well SF works in noisy band conditions.  I just happened to wake up and took a look at my screen and saw him spotted so I worked him in about five minutes and went back to bed.  He wasn't working very many stations.  We'll see.

Thanks Joel.

It is my understanding that CY9C is running “SUPERFox” so don’t you get that little note of “CY9C Verified” that was written into the latest version that confirms it is the real station you are working??

 

I’m not a big digital guy, but “Asking for a friend” ………………………

 

ZN

 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steven Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 7:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H

 

Well, I may have worked the same "pirate" at 0649.  Why do you think he was a pirate?

 

Steve, N4JQQ

 

On 8/28/2024 2:53 AM, Lanny Aldrich wrote:

I may have worked a PIRATE posing as CY9C on 3.567 at 0748Z.  Logged him anyway.

73, Lanny  K1LEC

______________________________________________________________

ADXA mailing list

Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm

Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net

Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

______________________________________________________________
ADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html