[ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H

k5cs mail.k5cs at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 14:01:53 EDT 2024


*You only live once...GO FOR IT!!*


On 8/28/2024 12:42 PM, Dennis Schaefer wrote:
> All three of my early AM contacts showed up - 80 and 40 FT8 and 30M 
> CW.  Also, 15 CW from yesterday.
>
> I’m debating myself about whether to fight the ticks and chiggers and 
> hook up the 160M inverted-L.  It would be nice to get a sweep of all 
> the bands below 6M.
>
> RZ
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:30 PM Steven Rutledge 
> <steven.t.rutledge at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Updated log.  I’m in it on 80, F/H, no SF.
>
>     Steve, N4JQQ
>
>     BTW, Bernie says team will do F/H when conditions are bad as they
>     were early this morning.
>
>>     On Aug 28, 2024, at 11:01 AM, w5zn at w5zn.org wrote:
>>
>>     
>>
>>     They are only doing one long update a day so far, usually around
>>     6 or 7 PM and sometimes it is an hour so behind getting all of
>>     the updates from the different stations.
>>
>>     I don’t expect another update until tonight.
>>
>>     ZN
>>
>>     *From:* Steven Rutledge <steven.t.rutledge at gmail.com>
>>     *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 10:17 AM
>>     *To:* w5zn at w5zn.org
>>     *Subject:* Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H
>>
>>     Log not updated.  No deal breaker for me.  I will check after the
>>     22 match today.
>>
>>     Steve
>>
>>     On 8/28/2024 8:00 AM, w5zn at w5zn.org wrote:
>>
>>         I worked them on 160 meters last night and they were in
>>         SuperFox mode. Last night was the first night on 160 so they
>>         have not yet updated their log and stats.
>>
>>         160 was horribly noisy last night and I could hear their
>>         signal several sequences before it would decode, so I’m not
>>         so sure SF is good under noisy condx.
>>
>>         ZN
>>
>>         *From:* Steven Rutledge <steven.t.rutledge at gmail.com>
>>         <mailto:steven.t.rutledge at gmail.com>
>>         *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 7:47 AM
>>         *To:* w5zn at w5zn.org
>>         *Subject:* Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H
>>
>>         Interesting.  He was not running SF.  And, his stats in club
>>         log include nothing on 80 or 160. I was wondering about that
>>         too.  But, WFWL. Band was very noisy and the signal was very
>>         weak.  I'm not sure how well SF works in noisy band
>>         conditions.  I just happened to wake up and took a look at my
>>         screen and saw him spotted so I worked him in about five
>>         minutes and went back to bed.  He wasn't working very many
>>         stations. We'll see.
>>
>>         Thanks Joel.
>>
>>         Steve
>>
>>         On 8/28/2024 7:43 AM, w5zn at w5zn.org wrote:
>>
>>             It is my understanding that CY9C is running “SUPERFox” so
>>             don’t you get that little note of “CY9C Verified” that
>>             was written into the latest version that confirms it is
>>             the real station you are working??
>>
>>             I’m not a big digital guy, but “Asking for a friend”
>>             ………………………
>>
>>             ZN
>>
>>             *From:* adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>>             <adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net>
>>             <mailto:adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net> *On Behalf Of
>>             *Steven Rutledge
>>             *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2024 7:39 AM
>>             *To:* adxa at mailman.qth.net
>>             *Subject:* Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H
>>
>>             Well, I may have worked the same "pirate" at 0649.  Why
>>             do you think he was a pirate?
>>
>>             Steve, N4JQQ
>>
>>             On 8/28/2024 2:53 AM, Lanny Aldrich wrote:
>>
>>                 I may have worked a PIRATE posing as *CY9C* on 3.567
>>                 at 0748Z.  Logged him anyway.
>>
>>                 73, Lanny  K1LEC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                 ______________________________________________________________
>>
>>                 ADXA mailing list
>>
>>                 Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
>>
>>                 Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>
>>                 Post:mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net <mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net>
>>
>>                   
>>
>>                 This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
>>
>>                 Please help support this email list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>             ______________________________________________________________
>>
>>             ADXA mailing list
>>
>>             Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
>>
>>             Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>
>>             Post:mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net <mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net>
>>
>>               
>>
>>             This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
>>
>>             Please help support this email list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
>>
>     ______________________________________________________________
>     ADXA mailing list
>     Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
>     Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>     Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net
>
>     This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>     Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ADXA mailing list
> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post:mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/adxa/attachments/20240828/9965bc96/attachment.html>


More information about the ADXA mailing list