[ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H

[Lanny Aldrich]

So I didn’t work a Pirate on 80M at 0748Z afterall!

Band
SSB
FT8
80
1
40
2
30
2
20
1
17
1
1
15
1
12
2
10
2

73, Lanny  K1LEC


From: adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net <adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Steven Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 12:30 PM
To: w5zn at w5zn.org; adxa at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H

Updated log.  I’m in it on 80, F/H, no SF.

Steve, N4JQQ

BTW, Bernie says team will do F/H when conditions are bad as they were early this morning.


On Aug 28, 2024, at 11:01 AM, w5zn at w5zn.org<mailto:w5zn at w5zn.org> wrote:

They are only doing one long update a day so far, usually around 6 or 7 PM and sometimes it is an hour so behind getting all of the updates from the different stations.

I don’t expect another update until tonight.

ZN

From: Steven Rutledge <steven.t.rutledge at gmail.com<mailto:steven.t.rutledge at gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 10:17 AM
To: w5zn at w5zn.org<mailto:w5zn at w5zn.org>
Subject: Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H


Log not updated.  No deal breaker for me.  I will check after the 22 match today.

Steve
On 8/28/2024 8:00 AM, w5zn at w5zn.org<mailto:w5zn at w5zn.org> wrote:
I worked them on 160 meters last night and they were in SuperFox mode. Last night was the first night on 160 so they have not yet updated their log and stats.

160 was horribly noisy last night and I could hear their signal several sequences before it would decode, so I’m not so sure SF is good under noisy condx.

ZN

From: Steven Rutledge <steven.t.rutledge at gmail.com><mailto:steven.t.rutledge at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 7:47 AM
To: w5zn at w5zn.org<mailto:w5zn at w5zn.org>
Subject: Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H


Interesting.  He was not running SF.  And, his stats in club log include nothing on 80 or 160.  I was wondering about that too.  But, WFWL.  Band was very noisy and the signal was very weak.  I'm not sure how well SF works in noisy band conditions.  I just happened to wake up and took a look at my screen and saw him spotted so I worked him in about five minutes and went back to bed.  He wasn't working very many stations.  We'll see.

Thanks Joel.

Steve
On 8/28/2024 7:43 AM, w5zn at w5zn.org<mailto:w5zn at w5zn.org> wrote:
It is my understanding that CY9C is running “SUPERFox” so don’t you get that little note of “CY9C Verified” that was written into the latest version that confirms it is the real station you are working??

I’m not a big digital guy, but “Asking for a friend” ………………………

ZN

From: adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net<mailto:adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net> <adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net><mailto:adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Steven Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 7:39 AM
To: adxa at mailman.qth.net<mailto:adxa at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H


Well, I may have worked the same "pirate" at 0649.  Why do you think he was a pirate?



Steve, N4JQQ


On 8/28/2024 2:53 AM, Lanny Aldrich wrote:
I may have worked a PIRATE posing as CY9C on 3.567 at 0748Z.  Logged him anyway.
73, Lanny  K1LEC






______________________________________________________________

ADXA mailing list

Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm

Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net



This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net<http://www.qsl.net/>

Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html





______________________________________________________________

ADXA mailing list

Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm

Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net



This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net<http://www.qsl.net/>

Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/adxa/attachments/20240828/79ff32d5/attachment-0001.html>