[ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H

[w5znjoel at gmail.com]

I worked them on 160 meters last night and they were in SuperFox mode. Last night was the first night on 160 so they have not yet uploaded their log and stats.

 

160 was horribly noisy last night and I could hear their signal several sequences before it would decode, so I’m not so sure SF is good under noisy condx. It would have been much better on CW (seriously). They started out on 160 CW late yesterday, about 20 mins before our sunset. They were horribly weak, obviously, since the sun was still up and they peaked, if you can call it that, during gray line, but only to about 80% copy then their signal faded into the QRN and horrible noise. They moved to FT8 but it was around 0400 before I could actually decode them in SF even though I could hear their tones.

 

I’m not a big digital guy, so just commenting “for a friend” !!  😊

 

ZN

 

 

 

From: adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net <adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Steven Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 7:50 AM
To: adxa at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H

 

Interesting.  He was not running SF.  And, his stats in club log include nothing on 80 or 160.  I was wondering about that too.  But, WFWL.  Band was very noisy and the signal was very weak.  I'm not sure how well SF works in noisy band conditions.  I just happened to wake up and took a look at my screen and saw him spotted so I worked him in about five minutes and went back to bed.  He wasn't working very many stations.  We'll see.

Thanks Joel.

Steve 

On 8/28/2024 7:43 AM, w5zn at w5zn.org <mailto:w5zn at w5zn.org>  wrote:

It is my understanding that CY9C is running “SUPERFox” so don’t you get that little note of “CY9C Verified” that was written into the latest version that confirms it is the real station you are working??

 

I’m not a big digital guy, but “Asking for a friend” ………………………

 

ZN

 

From: adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net <mailto:adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net>   <mailto:adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net> <adxa-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Steven Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 7:39 AM
To: adxa at mailman.qth.net <mailto:adxa at mailman.qth.net> 
Subject: Re: [ADXA] CY9C on 80M Std. F/H

 

Well, I may have worked the same "pirate" at 0649.  Why do you think he was a pirate?

 

Steve, N4JQQ

 

On 8/28/2024 2:53 AM, Lanny Aldrich wrote:

I may have worked a PIRATE posing as CY9C on 3.567 at 0748Z.  Logged him anyway.

73, Lanny  K1LEC






______________________________________________________________
ADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net
 
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 





______________________________________________________________
ADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net
 
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/adxa/attachments/20240828/cefa29f2/attachment.html>