[ADXA] What the Heck is a "WARC Band" ? COUGH COUGH

[Sandy Hutson]

You should know these refinements more than 99% of the DXers as President of the ARRL in the past years. WARC to me simply means the first 3 new bands that started years ago and most referred to things that way for years, not to reflect on changes later on 40m as WRC and other subtleties, etc. Most DXers were not into the IARU etc changing situations if  not on the ARRL Board of Directors and other pertinent committees. So, you are right and described things better than 99% could have done from simple memories. TU for such detailed clarifications! 👍  The ITU convening randomly vs every 4 years is something that did not influence my chasing DX in those past days and was background info to most DXers that were not on some sort of special committee in the ham community… Anyway, thanks for telling us of  your deep knowledge of things.  Explains some pertinent administrative history of our hobby.
73-
San YY

Sent from Mail for Windows

From: w5zn at w5zn.org
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 4:41 PM
To: adxa at mailman.qth.net
Subject: [ADXA] What the Heck is a "WARC Band" ?

Greetings ADXA Folks,

What the heck is a “WARC band”? 

My amateur radio license affords me the privilege (yes, a privilege, not a right) to operate on frequencies allocated to the Amateur Radio Service but I can’t find any authorization that permits me to operate on a “WARC” band. Is WARC a licensed radio service?

OK, I’ll confess this is a pet peeve of mine. The Amateur Radio Service, through a lot of hard work by ARRL and the International Amateur Radio Union, acquired three new HF allocations at the World Administrative Radio Conference (WARC) in 1979 in the 30-, 17-, and 12-meter band segments. That was 44 years ago so why can’t we, after all these years, refer to them as amateur radio bands? 

In fact, a WARC no longer exists! The conference still occurs but the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) renamed it to World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) several years ago and established it would convene regularly every four years instead of randomly like the WARC did.

The last WRC action that involved an amateur HF allocation was in 2003 at WRC-03 when, once again, ARRL and the International Amateur Radio Union were successful in acquiring a worldwide primary allocation for the amateur service at 40 meters from 7.0 to 7.2 MHz. Of course, prior to that date and currently the USA enjoys a 7.0 to 7.3 MHz allocation however, for those licensed prior to this action you will recall the rest of the world was only authorized a 100 KHz segment, from 7.0 to 7.1 MHz, for use and the spectrum above 7.1 MHz was filled with commercial broadcast stations that made the band pretty much unusable at night in the US, especially during the winter months.

So, why don’t we refer to the “new” primary allocation at 40 meters as a WRC band?

As I said, it’s simply a pet peeve of mine and folks will refer to things as they wish, that’s perfectly fine with me. Just remember, though, the next time you refer to the 30-, 17-, or 12-meter amateur band as a “WARC band” I’ll probably ask, in humor, “What the heck is a WARC band?” and then ask if you’ve operated in the new WRC band? 😊

73 Joel W5ZN


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/adxa/attachments/20230911/ae5fe36f/attachment.html>