[ADXA] LoTW and such

BILL KENNAMER k5fuv at prodigy.net
Thu Mar 30 18:20:52 EDT 2023


 As they used to say when I was racing, "Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go?"
FUV

    On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 05:13:36 PM CDT, Stan Ross <k5vr.stan at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 I seldom chime in on such discussions, however, in my limited IT experience (just 40+ years in hospital diagnostic imaging equipment) we seldom had networking issues until every piece of equipment began dumping megabytes if not gigabytes of data at once on the network.
 I liken it to thousands of cars getting on the LA freeway every day at the same time versus letting them trickle on a few at a time spread out over a period of time. We never seem to have the slowness issue outside of contests or when someone decides to dump many (large) logs at the same time. 
The old system just needs looking at seriously to be able to handle the increased demand with the increased users, digital modes, logging programs, etc. 
It just takes $$$ and time.
StanK5VR 

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 30, 2023, at 4:44 PM, Steven Rutledge <crownhaven at bellsouth.net> wrote:




I’ve read the thread on the LOTW reflector.  Hard to stomach.  They should build another reflector for “impatient IT experts.”  Dave tries to inject some sanity into the discussion but it always gets out of control.
I’m very happy with LOTW.  Better than waiting over a year for a mailed card hoping your money wasn’t stolen before it got there.
Steve QQ

On Mar 30, 2023, at 4:50 PM, WB5JJJ <wb5jjj at gmail.com> wrote:



I, for one, am not one who likes software that uploads to LoTW one at a time.  If I use such a program, I disable the realtime uploads.  I know many don't care, they just want instant gratification in everything they do.  
I too remember the "good old days" of the paper QSL exchange, and I still love collecting cards as I'm up to almost 1,000 now after 49 years and 11 months of doing so.  
Otherwise, instant uploads are a total waste of LoTW computer resources.  I wish this would be banned so that only batches of say 10 or more are allowed.  Or even a max number of QSO's in a 24-hour period until they work through this server bottleneck.  As they say in pileups, "Spread it out guys".  With FT8/4 and some logging programs that creates a bunch of single uploads that stress on the system for sure.  
Plus, I always double-check my contacts no matter what mode, especially those that I have to enter manually for SSB/CW and such.  Fat fingers always rule.  
And like Joel, I want instant gratification, but that comes at a price.  I prefer to wake up in the morning and check to find that an ATNO has been uploaded to LoTW and I have verification, even if it was several months (or years) ago.  And yes, I've worked folks that use one at a time loggers and I see their confirmation within a couple of minutes many times right after a bulk upload of mine.  But if you are NOT a DXPedition, why do this?  
Which is worse during a contest, one at a time or everybody uploading their log in the first hour after the contest closes, like me?  And then you have guys who finally get around to digitizing their log from the past half-century of operation and uploading it all right at the end of a contest by accident.  
To each his own, but remember you are just one of thousands that use the 20+ year old system on a daily basis.  Until the upload section of LoTW is updated, please be considerate of others.  
Perhaps a seperate computer system (buffer) to handle the uploads and then pass them off to the LoTW computer system in a timely manner without LoTW being clobbered so often by single QSO uploads or massive 30m ones as well?  Take these individual QSO files and merge them into larger files to then be passed on to LoTW as one.  
73's
George - WB5JJJ
HoIP - 100105______________________________________________________________
ADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
______________________________________________________________
ADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________
ADXA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/adxa/attachments/20230330/e35beeb0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ADXA mailing list