[ADXA] VP6D had great ops

Fri Nov 2 22:40:30 EDT 2018

Jay, 

Thanks for emphasizing, with personal experiences, what has been
highlighted many times....it doesn't take a big station to work DX! The
good DXPeditions, like VP6D, know what their doing and not only have
good operators but set up good receive systems as well. 

Congrats on jumping in the mud and getting them in your log on several
band! 

ZN 

On 2018-11-02 20:19, Jay Bromley wrote:

> Now for a lighter note.  
> 
> Two nights before Ducie went off the air, my wife Kathy comes into the shack asking what I was up to?  My reply was---- something I shouldn't be doing.  I had worked VP6D on all the upper bands I had an antenna for, but I didn't have any low band antennas up in the air after getting the beam up.  I had VP6DX on 160m CW years ago, but I didn't have them on 30-80 meters.  So I got to looking at my tuner in an evil mad scientist sort of way and proceeded to load it into the shield of my coax going up to the beam.  That right the shield of my coax plus all the losses from the tuner.  So with my mighty 100 watts I proceeded on 30m CW calling and calling.  Even with preamp 2 turned on the 7600, they were not moving my S meter, but I could hear them plain as day with my headset.  I am sure they were running power, but I wasn't about to try loading my amp into that setup.  So I call and called.  A few times they called CQ and you could tell they were hearing some noise being modula
 ted by
CW, hi.  I could imagine seeing the operator, pushing against the headset closer to him with his head down, saying to himself who is that weak signal that doesn't give up.  My thoughts were ---God let me be loud enough for them to get my call.  BTW, I never turned the VFO, left on the spotted frequency.  It took over an hour and I like to feel over when they called me.  I got the TU and I was off to 40m on cloud nine!  
> 
> I heard the 40m CW pileup and went to FT8 on 40m instead of trying CW.  I got them on FT8 on 40m with just a few calls.  So then I went on 80m trying them on FT8.  That was just asking too much of the shield antenna I guess, but I quit feeling great heading for bed.  Not so much about my FT8 contact on 40m as I seen prints on that mode into a dummy load before, but CW on 30m with that setup was super cool I still can't get over it.  Something I will always remember.  The next night in the dark I put up a wire I had laying around and told Kathy it only has to stay up a night or two.  I sort of fashion it as a 160m inverted L with one elevated radial.  It looked and still looks horrible.  However I worked them again on 30m FT8 and RTTY.  Then 40m CW and then moved up to 160m, as they were not on 80m yet.  So even though I didn't need them on 160m I thought what the heck.  While checking 80m on CW and FT8 frequencies I screwed up when I went back to 160m.  I left the split off
 , I bet
no one has done that one before!  Some knuckle head came back to me W5JAY 5NN, like I couldn't tell the real thing from a pirate down under his signal.  Anyway I noticed my screwup and corrected it.  Every time I called they would fade out, so I just quit and listened for a while.  At 0405 UTC I got them on 80m CW and 14 minutes later I went back to 160m to get them there just for fun.  I left the rig on 80m FT8 thinking they would be on around later.  I missed them by a few hours, but I was checking every few hours I got up from bed. 
> 
> VP8D wasn't ATNO, but sure was fun chasing DX with friends, helping some along the way with computer and logging issues.  The VP6 ops were super ops IMHO. 
> 
> 73 de w5jay/jay.. 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ADXA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/adxa
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ADXA at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/adxa/attachments/20181102/61b4bf58/attachment.html>