[ADXA] Swains Isl. INFO
LennyK5OVC at wmconnect.com
LennyK5OVC at wmconnect.com
Wed Feb 23 08:42:00 EST 2005
American Samoa and Swain’s Island
A White Paper prepared by ARRL Chief Executive Officer David Sumner, K1ZZ
February 22, 2005
The purpose of this White Paper is to set out the facts concerning an
application for IARU membership on behalf of a small organization of radio amateurs
recently established in American Samoa and related questions concerning the
possibility of Swain’s Island qualifying as a separate DXCC entity.
Formation of American Samoa Amateur Radio Association (ASARA)
On November 19, 2003 a press release was issued announcing that a formal
meeting had been held on November 4, 2003 to establish the new "American Samoa
Amateur Radio Association" and that "All the members present at the founding
meeting voted to apply for membership in Region III of the IARU." The press
release was signed by John Peters, K1ER, a resident of Hawaii, as "Adviser ASARA."
Subsequently it developed that only two amateurs resident in American Samoa
were actually present at this meeting.
ASARA’s Approach to ARRL, and ARRL’s Response
On December 9, 2003 ARRL President Haynie received a package from Kan
Mizoguchi, JA1BK, including the following letter dated November 4, 2003.
Dear Jim,
Following Kan Mizoguchi, JA1BK (Founding Director of IARU Reg. III) approach
regarding American Samoa Amateur Radio Association to become an IARU member.
As you did not seem to have any problems with this suggestion, we request the
ARRL to support our membership application to the IARU Region 3.
Due to transport difficulties from and to American Samoa, we would appreciate
if the ARRL would continue to represent American Samoa Amateur Radio
Association at IARU Conferences.
Many thanks in advance for your support,
Best regards
Lawrence A. Gandy AH8LG (Signed)
President
American Samoa Amateur Radio Association
Since the letter had come via a third party, President Haynie asked Mr. Gandy
to confirm that he had sent it. Mr. Gandy sent the letter by FAX to Mr.
Haynie on December 22. On the same day Mr. Haynie sent the following reply:
Dear Larry:
Thank you for sending by FAX on December 22 your letter of November 4. I did
not receive the original, and previously had received copies only from third
parties.
The ARRL is not able to support an IARU membership application from the
American Samoa Amateur Radio Association (ASARA). Please understand that the ASARA
is not being singled out in this regard. The ARRL could not support or agree
to the consideration of an application from any other organization within the
United States and its dependent areas, which in ITU Region 3 include Guam, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Baker, Howland,
Jarvis, and Wake Islands, Palmyra Atoll, and Kingman Reef in addition to
American Samoa.
In its dealings with federal government agencies it is essential that the
ARRL continue to have the exclusive right to represent the IARU to its
government. One of the founding principles of the IARU is that it is essential for a
country’s radio amateurs to speak with one voice to their government, and in
particular to their telecommunications administration. The administration for
American Samoa is of course the same as for the rest of the United States.
Similarly, the U.S. government represents the interests of the Region 3 areas listed
in the previous paragraph to international organizations such as the ITU.
The ARRL has long represented the interests of the radio amateurs of American
Samoa. The additional spectrum at 7 MHz that you will enjoy beginning in 2009
is the direct result of the ARRL’s efforts, in concert with the global
efforts coordinated through the IARU. You may recall that several years ago,
following a visit to American Samoa by an ARRL Director, the ARRL petitioned for you
to gain access to 7100-7300 kHz on a secondary, non-interference basis; the
petition was not successful, but this was not for lack of trying on our part.
Within the IARU, the ARRL was a founding member of the IARU Region 3
Association, pays dues to IARU Region 3 as well as to IARU Region 2, and has sent
representatives to every IARU Region 3 Conference ever held. There will be an ARRL
delegation representing the American amateurs in Region 3 at the conference in
Taipei in February 2004. Licensed amateurs in American Samoa are eligible for
full membership in the ARRL and are eligible to vote in ARRL elections in both
the Pacific Division and the Pacific Section.
While we cannot support an application for admission to the IARU, the ARRL
does recognize that it is desirable for Amateur Radio to be well organized in
American Samoa. In that regard there is an ARRL affiliated club, the Samoa
Amateur Radio Association, which at last report had 16 members.
Finally, for the record I must take exception to the statement in the first
paragraph of your letter that "you did not seem to have any problems with this
suggestion." No one representing the ASARA had ever discussed this matter with
me prior to November 4. [Emphasis added]
If you have any questions regarding how the ARRL is representing your
interests either to the U.S. government or within the IARU, I will be pleased to see
that they are answered.
73,
Sincerely,
Jim Haynie, W5JBP
President
Later correspondence clarified that the Samoa Amateur Radio Association is
not currently active.
The principles described in the third paragraph of Mr. Haynie’s letter are
extremely important to the ARRL. For more than 30 years the ARRL has accepted
its responsibility to represent the interests of FCC amateur licensees
throughout the United States and its dependent areas, including those in ITU Region 3.
The ARRL position was also communicated to IARU Region 3.
Why Was ASARA Formed?
While it was not stated in the correspondence from Mr. Gandy, the impetus for
separate IARU membership for American Samoa appeared to be a desire to create
a new DXCC entity of Swain’s Island. Under the current DXCC rules, Swain’s
Island is much too close to the other islands that make up American Samoa to
count as a separate DXCC entity. However, if American Samoa were a "Political
Entity" a different distance criterion would apply. Under this criterion, some
people are under the impression that Swain’s Island would qualify. However, no
official determination of the actual distance has ever been made since
American Samoa did not and does not qualify as a "Political Entity." According to
several maps, Swain’s Island is about 320 km from Tutuila which is too close by
30 km.
The DXCC rules were rewritten in 1998 to add separate IARU membership as a
basis for determining Political Entities. This solved some problems at the time
but had the unintended consequence of encouraging applications for IARU
membership solely for that reason.
Pitcairn Island Amateur Radio Association and Ducie Island
For example, one such application was made on behalf of the Pitcairn Island
Amateur Radio Association. Before the application could be considered it had to
be endorsed by the Radio Society of Great Britain, which is a member of IARU
Region 3 and has long represented certain UK dependent areas including
Pitcairn Island. Therefore, prior to submission of the application the following
letter dated March 11, 2001 was sent to RSGB President Don Beattie, G3OZF (now
G3BJ):
Dear Don,
Following Jim Smith, VK9NS approach regarding Pitcairn Island Amateur Radio
Association to become an IARU member. As you did not seem to have any problems
with this suggestion, we request the RSGB to support our membership
application to the IARU Region 3.
Due to transport difficulties from and to Pitcairn, we would appreciate if
the RSGB would continue to represent Pitcairn Island Amateur Radio Association
at IARU conferences.
Many thanks in advance for your support.
Best regards
Tom Christian VP6TC
President
Pitcairn Island Amateur Radio Association
On April 14, 2001 Mr. Beattie replied as follows:
Dear Tom,
Many thanks for your letter of 11 March 2001 concerning the Pitcairn Island
Amateur Radio Association.
I confirm that the RSGB is happy to support the application you are making
for the Association to become an IARU member. I also confirm that, should your
application be accepted, the RSGB would be pleased to represent you at IARU
Conferences.
I have copied this letter to the Secretary of Region 3, Keigo Komuro, JA1KAB,
so that he is aware of the RSGB position.
With very best wishes,
Don Beattie, G3BJ
President
A reasonable question is why the RSGB position is different from that of the
ARRL. First, there is a long history of Amateur Radio societies, where they
have existed in UK colonies, being separately represented in the IARU. There are
numerous examples over time, currently including Anguilla, Bermuda, British
Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat, and Turks & Caicos.
Second, licensing there is decentralized. For example, if one wishes to apply for
an amateur license in the British Virgin Islands, one addresses the
Telecommunications Manager in Road Town, Tortola. Be that as it may, the RSGB could, if
it wished, retain the right and responsibility of representing the interests
of amateurs in the remaining UK dependent territories that are not separately
represented in the IARU.
With the RSGB endorsement the PIARA application could be submitted for vote
by the IARU member-societies. It was approved, but only just barely: with 57
affirmative votes required for approval, only 58 were received.
With the admission of PIARA to the IARU, Pitcairn Island became a DXCC
"Political Entity" and a separate DXCC entity of Ducie Island was created.
Correcting the Unintended Consequence
While there is some virtue in new DXCC entities being created from time to
time, it is clearly undesirable for the IARU, which is not the sponsor of DXCC,
to have to bear the burden of dealing with applications for IARU membership
that are made solely or primarily for that purpose. Such applications do nothing
to further the objectives of the IARU. While the ARRL clearly has the right
not to endorse an application on behalf of American Samoa or other dependent
territories of the United States that are already represented in the IARU by the
ARRL, it was apparent that other applications might be submitted in the
future that might cause difficulties for other IARU member-societies. Therefore, at
its January 2004 meeting the ARRL Board of Directors adopted the following
resolution:
WHEREAS, the DXCC 2000 program adopted by the Board in 1998 included changes
to the criteria for a DXCC entity, and
WHEREAS, one of the new criteria makes separate IARU membership the basis for
determination of a "political entity," and
WHEREAS, this rule has served a constructive purpose with respect to existing
IARU societies, but
WHEREAS, the rule also has had unforeseen consequences in creating an
incentive for the creation of proposed IARU societies that do not further the
objectives of the IARU, and
RECOGNIZING that elimination of the rule has no effect on the DXCC entities
that already have been created as a result of the rule,
RESOLVED, that the DXCC rules are hereby amended by deleting IARU membership
as a basis for determination of a "political entity."
IARU Region 3 Conference and Directors Meeting, Taipei, February 2004
The next IARU Region 3 Conference was held in Taipei on February 16-20, 2004
(postponed from September 2003 because of the SARS epidemic).
PIARA was not represented at the Taipei Conference by the RSGB as had been
agreed (although an RSGB delegate was present at the Conference). Instead it was
represented by Kan Mizoguchi, JA1BK, a resident of Japan who is licensed for
Pitcairn Island as VP6BK. PIARA submitted several documents to the Conference
including one, Document No. 04/XII/033, that called on the Directors of IARU
Region 3 to forward the ASARA application to the IARU Administrative Council
for its review.
As previously noted, Mr. Mizoguchi is also involved in ASARA and is listed on
the ASARA roster, at an address in Hawaii and with the call sign KH6BK, as an
associate member.
The documents received by the Region 3 Secretary sufficiently in advance of
the Conference, such as Document 33, were distributed in advance. In response
to Document 33, ARRL sent the following to the IARU Region 3 Secretary and
Directors on January 26, 2004:
Keigo Komuro, JA1KAB
Secretary, IARU Region 3
Dear Mr. Secretary:
Article 55 of the Constitution of IARU Region 3 provides: "Neither a
Conference nor the Directors will take any decision contrary to the Constitution of
IARU nor will they interfere in the internal affairs of any member Society."
The ARRL is a member Society of IARU Region 3, representing American Samoa
along with other dependent areas of the United States that are located in Region
3. Conference Document No. 04/XII/033 is a blatant attempt to interfere in
the internal affairs of the ARRL.
The consideration of this document by the Conference would clearly be in
violation of our rights as a member Society. Accordingly, the ARRL insists that
Document No. 04/XII/033 be removed from the Conference agenda.
Sincerely,
David Sumner, K1ZZ
Secretary
In further defense of its rights as an IARU member-society the ARRL sent the
following on February 10, 2004:
Keigo Komuro, JA1KAB
Secretary, IARU Region 3
Dear Mr. Secretary:
At the Seventh Regional Conference of the IARU Region 3 Association [1988],
Motion 9-O was adopted unanimously, without objection or abstention. Motion 9-O
reads:
That the Conference,
Resolved
That the principles enumerated in Administrative Council Resolutions 85-8 and
86-3 be adopted as the policy of IARU Region 3 Association,
It being further resolved that the member Societies shall mutually support
each other to give full effect to their policies.
Resolution 85-8 in turn reads:
RESOLUTION 85-8
concerning guarantee of the exclusive right of a member-society to represent
the IARU in its country or territory
resolved, by the IARU Administrative Council, Auckland, November 1985, that
no member-society nor regional organization, nor the Administrative Council,
shall recognize any amateur radio society in another country or territory which
is represented by an IARU member-society; and
further resolved, that no member-society nor regional organization, nor the
Administrative Council, shall have any communication with such society which in
any way detracts from or interferes with, the sole and exclusive right of an
IARU member-society to represent the IARU in its country or territory. Should
any doubt arise as to such communication, the wishes of the IARU
member-society in the country or territory concerned shall prevail.
Please be advised that the ARRL regards any communication with an amateur
radio organization within its operating territory as a violation of this policy.
The operating territory of the ARRL includes the following areas of Region 3:
Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Baker,
Howland, Jarvis, and Wake Islands, Palmyra Atoll, and Kingman Reef. The only
exception is with regard to communication with recognized specialty
organizations such as AMSAT where there is an established cooperative relationship
between the specialty organization and the ARRL.
Please ensure that all officials of Region 3 and all member-societies within
the Region are aware of and abide by this Region 3 policy.
Sincerely,
David Sumner, K1ZZ
Chief Executive Officer
At their meeting just prior to the Taipei Conference, the Region 3 Directors
decided to return the ASARA application and did so on February 13, 2004.
John Peters, K1ER, who has previously been mentioned, was present at the
Conference as the delegate of the Fiji Association of Radio Amateurs (FARA). As
the delegate from FARA Mr. Peters submitted a document, No. 04/XII/075 dated
February 13, 2004, calling for a vote of no confidence in the Region 3 Directors,
among other reasons for their having returned the ASARA application. Other
documents were submitted by PIARA relating to proposed changes to the IARU
Region 3 Constitution.
The Conference thus faced the dilemma of how to deal with the issues of the
handling of the ASARA application and the Region 3 Constitution without
detracting from its principal work. A Special Committee was created under the
chairmanship of Conference Chairman Ralph Jer-Kei Yang, BV2FB. The Special Committee
reported to the Final Plenary of the Conference and noted that during the
course of its work, PIARA and FARA had withdrawn the previously mentioned
Documents 33 and 75. Among the Recommendations of the Special Committee were:
The Special Committee has reviewed the correspondence between ARRL and Region
3 concerning the application by ASARA, and finds it to be in keeping with the
provisions of the relevant Constitutions and IARU Resolutions. We recommend
to the Final Plenary that the release of this correspondence is a matter for
the ARRL to decide.
We encourage ASARA to engage in a dialogue with the ARRL over the areas of
contention.
The recommendations of the Special Committee were adopted by the Final
Plenary. The Final Plenary also unanimously adopted a vote of confidence in the
Directors. On March 12, 2004 the Region 3 Secretary circulated the following
message to the Region 3 Member Societies, not all of which were present at the
Conference:
Dear Colleagues:
Your Directors have asked me to transmit the following message to you:
"The documents of our recent 12th IARU Region 3 Conference are displayed on
the Region 3 Web page at: http://www.jarl.or.jp/iaru-r3/12r3c/docs/docs.htm
The Reports of the Working Groups are also displayed there including the
Report from a Special Committee.
This letter to you is necessary because it will be some time before the
minutes of the Conference, the official means by which events of the conference
will be made known, are ready for distribution.
Paper 67 [from PIARA, withdrawn] was equivalent to a vote of no confidence in
the Directors and was raised at the initial Plenary session of the
Conference. Following objections to the Paper by several Delegates the matter was
referred to a Special Committee for review.
Paper 75 [from FARA, also withdrawn], also proposing a vote of no confidence
in the Directors, was received by participants during the Conference.
The Special Committee found that the Directors had acted correctly and that
no fault or wrongdoing whatsoever had been made by them. They were exonerated
from any improper act.
A vote of confidence in the Directors proposed by a Member Society was
carried unanimously by the conference thus vindicating the action of the Directors.
This letter is for early clarification because your Directors have found some
incomplete news reports circulating in the electronic media. These actions
will be completely recorded in the minutes of the conference."
Yours sincerely,
Keigo Komuro, JA1KAB
Secretary, IARU Region 3
For an independent view of what happened in Taipei, refer to the March/April
2004 issue of Break-In, the journal of the New Zealand Association of Radio
Transmitters. A report on the conference written by Peter Lake, ZL2AZ, includes
the following:
A key issue that emerged in the documents published prior to the conference
was a call by Kan Mizoguchi VP6BK/JA1BK representing PIARA (Pitcairn Island,
the newest member of Region 3) for constitutional change. He was supported by
John Peters 3D2AM/K1ER, who held the FARA (Fiji) vote. It became clear that it
was a move to get a new society established in American Samoa (ASARA), which
required a change to the Constitution. Amateur radio in American Samoa is
regulated by the FCC and covered by the ARRL that represents all US territories in
the Pacific and elsewhere. Creating a new society within their jurisdiction
would be direct interference in another countries affairs. Apparently the end
goal was to have Swains Island much further out in the Pacific declared a new
"entity" under DXCC rules. However, the DXCC rule under paragraph 1(c) allowing
this criteria was rescinded by the ARRL Board of Directors on January 20, 2004,
prior to the conference, making this action pointless.
In an effort to guide societies prior to the conference, the Directors
obtained a legal opinion from Michael Owen VK3KI, one of the original architects of
the constitution. This action was the subject of complaint by Mizoguchi and
Peters. On analysis, the changes proposed were essentially unworkable as
presented, and would create as many problems as they fixed.
Early in the proceedings PIARA unsuccessfully requested a debate on their
document calling for constitutional change. Soon other documents were tabled
under their name accusing the Directors and the Secretary of acting outside their
authority, and one threatening legal action against the ARRL. Such actions are
unprecedented in Region 3. The delegate representing FARA was noticeably
vocal in support. Our team was left to wonder if these usually supportive and
friendly societies knew of their agenda.
Considerable debate occurred from the outset, and the Chairman set up a
Special Committee to advise him on the issues. These issues and allegations
unfortunately dragged on until the Friday, wasting a lot of time and causing
unnecessary ill-feeling. In the end all the allegations were withdrawn, and the
Directors and Secretary were declared to have acted completely correctly and
honourably in the interests of Region 3. An examination of the Constitution for
possible changes, along with harmonization with the other Regions and the IARU
itself, was referred to the incoming Directors. It could take considerable time to
effect and major changes, even if required.
The Conference actions supporting the Region 3 Directors and finding the ARRL
position to be consistent with the Constitutions of IARU and Region 3 should
have put an end to the matter. Unfortunately, apparently relying on poor
advice from outside American Samoa, ASARA has not engaged in a dialogue with the
ARRL as recommended by the Conference but has continued its quixotic effort to
be recognized internationally. The appropriate way for a club such as ASARA to
be involved in organized Amateur Radio is as an ARRL affiliated club
participating in the Pacific Section.
KH8SI News Release
On February 18, 2005, a full year after the Conference, a news release over
the name of Kan, JA1BK, was distributed announcing a DXpedition to Swain’s
Island using the call sign KH8SI. The release claims that at the Taipei
Conference, ARRL Chief Executive Officer David Sumner, K1ZZ, "withdrew his objection" to
the ASARA application. That statement is false. At no time was the ARRL’s
objection to the ASARA application withdrawn by Mr. Sumner or anyone else
representing the ARRL at the Conference. Had the suggestion been made that the ARRL
do so, it would have been rejected. The release goes on to say that Mr. Sumner
"reneged on the agreement." That statement is also false. There was no
agreement, so there was nothing to renege. The ARRL position has been absolutely
consistent and has never wavered throughout this affair. Any claims to the
contrary are utterly without foundation.
Contacts with KH8SI operating from Swain’s Island will count for American
Samoa for DXCC purposes and for OC-200 for the RSGB’s Islands on the Air (IOTA)
program. May it be a safe and enjoyable operation for all concerned, conducted
in the spirit of goodwill that generally marks Amateur Radio.
More information about the ADXA
mailing list