[600MRG] re. Loop Antennas
david vanhorn
kc6ete at gmail.com
Mon Sep 9 17:10:52 EDT 2024
Why would you not want the antenna to act as a preselector narrowing the
bandwidth of the front end?
The front end noise dominates the receiver performance, and wide band =
noisy.
I understand that if it's narrow you need to retune more, and that's a
valid trade if you're wanting to be very frequency agile.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:01 PM Tom W8JI <w8ji at w8ji.com> wrote:
> What are you using for a receiver? What is overloading the receiver?
>
> I haven't used a tuned loop for a receive-only system since around 1970.
> As a matter of fact I avoid them! I either resistor load my loops or
> directly drive a low noise broadband amplifier with impedances set to make
> the system broad band.
>
> 73 Tom
>
> On 9/9/2024 12:10 PM, Dave Riley via 600MRG wrote:
>
> All the time improvements, yea...
> Now I think of a loop just made from old corroded silver plated copper
> tubing..
> Is it really acting like a broadbander or what, silver polish?? Must
> measure -3db points..
> Having fun anyhow...
>
> On 9/9/2024 9:12:13 AM, Edward Larsen <ki6rcm98 at gmail.com>
> <ki6rcm98 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Measured -3dB bandwidth at 201 khz using a frequency selective level
> meter was about 3.22 kHz, thus the Q was about 62. I used quantity-10,
> 1SV149 diodes in a series/parallel arrangement to achieve a broad tuning
> range. If there is a problem with over-voltage on the diodes during
> transmit, one might add a T/R relay to short-out the loop.
> When you use a high-Q loop like this it is most interesting tuning the
> bands since the loop also has to be tuned. It would be fun to try to
> automate loop tuning to match receiver tuning.
> 73
> Ed
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:35 AM david vanhorn <kc6ete at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What sort of Q values were you able to achieve with the loop loaded to 50
>> ohms?
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 5:01 PM Edward Larsen <ki6rcm98 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Dave for the posting regarding loop antennas for VLF. I like
>>> your approach and if your loop is out-performing a good active whip it is
>>> certainly working.
>>> I did some loop tests a few years ago. What I built was:
>>> 13 turns of silver plated AWG 22 stranded/teflon, 79" diameter, wires
>>> spaced 1/2" and crossed-over at the bottom (mobius wound).
>>> About 725 uH inductance resonated to VLF with 80-1250pF varactor
>>> tuning capacitance. Loop self resonance was about 3.02 MHz. I used a one
>>> turn coupling loop inside which I adjusted for 50 Ohm match. I've found
>>> that a high-Q tunable loop eliminates any overload or intermodulation
>>> problems in a receiver.
>>> I left this loop with KI6MTV when I moved to Arizona. I need to
>>> build another. It would tune about 140 kHz to 650 kHz via vari-cap diode
>>> tuning.
>>> I have designed/built a pretty good active amplified ferrite rod
>>> antenna for 17.2 kHz. I can email you the schematic if you like. It too
>>> parallel resonates the high-Q loop for sharp narrow-band tuning. The
>>> circuit could be modified for higher frequencies if desired.
>>> There has been a lot of excellent VLF loop design work in the past by
>>> several low frequency Gurus who published in the Lowdown magazine.
>>> Unfortunately this data is not available anywhere. I have most of the old
>>> Lowdowns going back to the 1980s.
>>> Keep on experimenting!
>>> 73
>>> Ed, KI6R
>>> SaddleBrooke, Az
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> 600MRG mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> K1FZY (WA4TPW) SK 9/29/37-4/13/15
>>
> ______________________________________________________________ 600MRG
> mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg Help:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net
> <600MRG at mailman.qth.net> This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net Please
> help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> 600MRG mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net <600MRG at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> Virus-free.www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> <#m_-4152977542014819116_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> ______________________________________________________________
> 600MRG mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
--
K1FZY (WA4TPW) SK 9/29/37-4/13/15
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/600mrg/attachments/20240909/aff0cd3a/attachment.html>
More information about the 600MRG
mailing list