[600MRG] Fwd: Re: 630 with a 68ft vertical?
Edward R Cole
kl7uw at acsalaska.net
Wed Sep 30 14:26:28 EDT 2020
>Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:25:33 -0800
>To: Jim Miller <jim at jtmiller.com>
>From: Edward R Cole <kl7uw at acsalaska.net>
>Subject: Re: [600MRG] 630 with a 68ft vertical?
>
>I put up a 43-foot inverted-L with 122-foot top wire. Only four
>radials at 100-foot or less. I built a coil 10-inch in diameter
>with 1.4-inch winding spacing about 11-inches long using No. 12
>solid copper wire (stripped std house wire). Antenna tuned using
>about 2/3 of the windings. Without top hat you would need more
>inductance in a loading coil.
>
>I made it using white plastic food cutting boards.
><http://www.kl7uw.com/630m.htm>http://www.kl7uw.com/630m.htm
>
>73, Ed - KL7UW
>
>At 07:41 AM 9/30/2020, Jim Miller wrote:
>>What sort of efficiency could I expect with just base loading a
>>68ft vertical on 630m? I have 32 radials with an average length of 100ft.
>>
>>For a long list of reasons I can't top load this antenna at all,
>>nor do I have any other antenna possibilities.
>>
>>I can put effort into making the loading coil as efficient as possible.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>jim ab3cv
>>______________________________________________________________
>>600MRG mailing list
>>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
>>Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>73, Ed - KL7UW
> http://www.kl7uw.com
>Dubus-NA Business mail:
> dubususa at gmail.com
73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
Dubus-NA Business mail:
dubususa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/600mrg/attachments/20200930/68fcbfb9/attachment.html>
More information about the 600MRG
mailing list