[600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test

[Rik Strobbe]

Hello Paul,

I will monitor both modes overnight on 136kHz dial and report in the morning.
In JT9-10 I had 5 copies of R7NT so far (QRB 2505km).

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

________________________________________
Van: 600mrg-bounces at mailman.qth.net <600mrg-bounces at mailman.qth.net> namens N1BUG <paul at n1bug.com>
Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 15:14
Aan: rsgb_lf_group at blacksheep.org; rsgb-lf-group at groups.io; Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; 600MRG at mailman.qth.net
Onderwerp: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test

Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to
transmit on 2200m.

I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial'
plus 395 Hz audio).

All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from
distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will
provide the best comparison between the modes.

If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run
for at least two nights, maybe three.

73,
Paul N1BUG
______________________________________________________________
600MRG mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:600MRG at mailman.qth.net
Message delivered to rik.strobbe at kuleuven.be

This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html