[50mhz] Re: [CW] QAP 50.1MHZ

[Bill Aycock]

I have been pretty happy using the Amateur Radio Q sigs for over 50 
years.  I fail to see why a redundant set, duplicating the long 
establishes ARRL set is needed.  The  NAV-AIR, ART 13 and ARC  38 jargon 
is cute, but superfluous to most Amateur needs.
This IS an Amateur radio list. Why should I add another 40-50 signals 
that have no additional information to convey? At my age, I have enough 
important things to remember without them.
Bill-W4BSG

Anthony W. DePrato wrote:

> At 10:04 PM 1/27/2006 -0600, Bill Aycock wrote:
>
>> The problem is that QAP is from the Aeronautical list, not the radio 
>> list.
>
>
>
> Being X NAVY AIR I wonder when the Aeronautical RADIO Q Sig List  is 
> Not a Radio list ? what was my ART 13 and ARC 38's ?
> 73
> DE
> WA4JQS
> QBE    ZUT    SK
>
>
> Moderator: Ray Brown, KB0STN
> _______________________________________________
> 50mhz mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/50mhz
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
> Post: mailto:50mhz at mailman.qth.net
>
>

-- 
Bill Aycock W4BSG
Woodville, Alabama