[50mhz] Re: [VHF] IC 7000 noise blanker question

[John Geiger (NE0P)]

I agree with this, as the NB in the FT100D is one of a kind.  Best I have ever seen.  Wish they could put one like it in every radio.  The NB in the TS2000 is pretty good also, but still behind the FT100D.

73s John NE0P


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: John Shalamskas <john at mlh.com>
Date:  Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:55:31 -0700

>The noise blanker in the FT100 series will take S9 ignition noise down 
>to just about nothing... the IC706 noise blanker is very weak by 
>comparison.  (On transmit, though, the 706 is a lot better - superior 
>speech processor and rugged final amplifier.  But you can't work 'em if 
>you can't hear 'em.)
>
>John KJ9U
>
>Ed Rodriguez wrote:
>> Hi Gang I currently use a IC 706 MKIIG in my Mustang, the Noise blanker does
>> not deter the pulse engine noise with the noise blanker off its S 6 to S7 with
>> it on its S 3 To S 4
>> it gets worst the lower in Freq you go..
>> 
>> Has anyone done a comparison between both with the noise blanker.
>> any inputs appreciated. dont want to blow 1400 bucs for no reason..
>> 
>> I had a Kenwood TS 480 mobile in the Mustang the the noise blanker in the
>> Kenwood out preformed the 706 MKIIG by at least 1 S unit to 2.
>> 
>> Thanks for reading
>> 
>> Ed
>> Wp4o
>> ------
>> Submissions:                    vhf at w6yx.stanford.edu
>> Subscription/removal requests:  vhf-request at w6yx.stanford.edu
>> Human list administrator:       vhf-approval at w6yx.stanford.edu
>> List rules and information:	http://www-w6yx.stanford.edu/vhf/
>------
>Submissions:                    vhf at w6yx.stanford.edu
>Subscription/removal requests:  vhf-request at w6yx.stanford.edu
>Human list administrator:       vhf-approval at w6yx.stanford.edu
>List rules and information:	http://www-w6yx.stanford.edu/vhf/
>
 

________________________________________________________________