[50mhz] Mystery QSB recording of 50.079.96
Anthony W. DePrato WA4JQS
wa4jqs at mikrotec.com
Wed Apr 27 21:18:19 EDT 2005
>i have only listened to it 3 or 4 times in a hurry but
>
>Reasons:
>
>1) The noise floor is constant throughout the entire recording.
i find this to be true also.
>2) The timing of the drops/increases in signal strength don't sound like any
>kind of man-made effect, like another station transmitting. The effects sound
>randomly based, both in interval and duration.
this is also true
>3) The effect on signal strength appears binary -- either "on" or "off".
>And the
>rise/fall time of the changes sounds virtually instantaneous, which pretty
>much
>rules out typical AGC reaction to adjacent-channel signals. An analysis of the
>audio waveform on an oscilloscope could confirm (or refute) these subjective
>observations.
i will look into this when i get more time at work.
>So I'm tentatively throwing my vote into the "lightning" camp, because I can't
>think of any other phenomenon that would explain these specific symptoms.
this may be true but until we find out if the mp3 is raw data or processed
before it was sent to us we will not be able to tell that ez. as for
lighting clamping of the receiver audio . you will have to look at the time
line intervals as lighting is a random timing occurrence. also the clamp
time and agc recovery time of the receiver should be know . then you can
look at the peak to peak signal voltage of both the suppressed wave and the
non suppressed wave. i would also want to look at the rise and decay times
of the signal. one other thing that should be know is lat and long of
beacon lat and long of each of the two receiving stations ant types and
headings at time of receiving and types of receivers used. the agc and NB
settings would be nice to know also. I first thought it was a bad
connection at the beacon as a quick look at the Scope showed the signal
decreasing at a constant rate then returning to a constant high output. but
without spending more time and knowing a few more details I am not so sure.
73 Tony
wa4jqs
on vhf since 1962
More information about the 50mhz
mailing list