[222mhz] A new TRIband FM mobile (Yes with 220 in it!!)

[Dr. Gerald N. Johnson]

In recent years the Chines makers haven't been great at delivering what 
they promised, like meeting emission and stability rules for both FCC 
part 90 commercial and part 97 for amateur applications. Worse they have 
imposed the recent narrow band modulation on part 97 radios where we 
haven't needed that and some users do have wimpy audio using the Chinese 
handhelds. I know at least one dealer that last year quit handling them 
because they didn't meet specs in his shop.

The more versatile radio is most likely to have spurious mixer products 
and excessive harmonics just because of the extra frequency coverage.

73, Jerry, K0CQ

On 9/19/2014 3:48 PM, Jim Lowman wrote:
> Some guys are slamming this radio on the QRZ page of Facebook already,
> yet no one has even received one to be able to evaluate it. Unbelievable!
>
> I'm not a fan of Chinese-made radios, but I have to give them credit for
> filling a niche left by Kenwood and not filled by them or any other
> manufacturer.
>
> Pretty good price, as well.
>
> 73 de Jim - AD6CW
>
> On 9/18/2014 7:22 PM, Chris Boone wrote:
>> About damn time!!! I do more on 220/440 than 2 so this would be
>> perfect!! Its not a TM742 but it will do.
>>
>> http://qrznow.com/anytone-5888uv-iii-tri-band/
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> 222mhz mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/222mhz
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:222mhz at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>