[160m] J20 logs
David Raymond
daraymond at iowatelecom.net
Mon Feb 5 20:27:32 EST 2007
Some confusion on my part, the "Band" in the J20 log search is in MHz, not
meters. That, however, still does not explain the disconnect as I did not
have a 30 meter QSO (my only CW QSO at the time showed up under the "band"
heading as "10") with them at that time I made the on-line inquiry. Some
direct responses to my posting from others indicate there would appear to be
some kind of problem. Hopefully, the Q's are getting logged correctly and
the problem is with the on-line reporting.
73...Dave
W0FLS
-----Original Message-----
From: 160m-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:160m-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of David Raymond
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 6:36 PM
To: 160m
Subject: [160m] FW: J20RR
For some reason, this did not get posted on the TB reflector so am posting
here. Some possible log problems with the J20 op. They may or may not be
aware of it by now. It would be helpful if someone in contact with the
operation might diplomatically let them know there's an issue.
73 to all...Dave
W0FLS
-----Original Message-----
From: David Raymond [mailto:daraymond at iowatelecom.net]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:44 AM
To: Topband
Subject: J20RR
For those of you interested in working the J20 operation, you might want to
check their log search which is intermittently updated. They do have some
apparent logging problems. I made a rock solid QSO with them on 80 meters
(the only QSO I've made with them)...it shows up in the log search as a 10
meter QSO (not even possible as there is no 10 meter prop from here to J2).
73...Dave
W0FLS
_______________________________________________
160m mailing list
160m at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/160m
More information about the 160m
mailing list