[160m] RM-11305

[Tim Hynde]

Tom Rauch wrote:

>RM-11305 was filed on behalf of the "Communications Think
>Tank" I think it is important to pay attention to this!
>
I read it, and I am still not sure I understand it. It sounds like 
rather than designate 7.000 to 7.150 for A1, RTTY etc it does the same thing
only separates by bandwidth type. Not trying to be a wise guy here, just 
want to understand what it is we are petitioning. Why would I be at the
mercy of other wider operators if the bands are segmented based on 
bandwidth?

It does not sound to me like there is NO regulation, only a change in 
how the band is regulated, can someone explain to me how I have this wrong?
The petition clearly states sections of band for signals 200hz wide, 500 
hz wide and so on. How does this negativly impact me? If I do choose to 
operate CW it means that no RTTY signals should be in that section of 
band as they are wider than 200 hz.

Tim KA8DDZ