[160m] FCC Filing for narrow mode segment
Tom Rauch
[email protected]
Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:33:41 -0500
> Perhaps I am far out of the loop here but what does "DOES NOT force
> PSK..." mean? Based on Tom's comments later in his post, I'm confused
> as to where PSK fits.
There was an incorrect assumption RM-10352 would force certain
modes like PSK into narrow slots. I wanted to clear that up.
> More importantly, where does PSK fit?
See above.
> I am also confused as to whether Tom is "For" or "Against" RM-10352.
I support RM-10352. It makes sense and is long overdue!
Since the 1970's, the FCC has been drawn into several disputes
involving SSB/CW conflicts. Since digital modes are probably the
next frontier for experimentation, we also should set aside an area
free from wide-mode QRM.
It really doesn't change the band for people following the bandplan
now, it would just prevent intentional or accidental QRM in the
future.
Remember...160 would have had a narrow mode area like all other
bands, if it wasn't pieced back to amateurs in small 25 kHz
segments over years of time.
73, Tom W8JI
[email protected]