[10m] RE: CQ Magazine Response to WSJ BPL

Sat May 1 15:07:08 EDT 2004

Wow,
Well said. Thank you Mr. Moseson for that well written, and knowledgable
response. I certainly couldn't have put it better myself. Seeing the =
article
expertly analyzed like that really brought to light some of the dirty =
tricks
and Thank you for supporting the amateur radio culture. I know that if =
the
average citizen were presented with this letter instead of the negative
press and sugar coated images the FCC is putting forth they would seek =
one
of the other plentiful alternate internet service sources.=20

73 DE KG6FHG/4 <SK>

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On =
Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 4:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: 10m digest, Vol 4 #61 - 1 msg

Send 10m mailing list submissions to
	[email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/10m
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	[email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
	[email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of 10m digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. CQ Magazine Response to WSJ BPL ([email protected])