From af5cc2 at gmail.com Fri Mar 3 17:34:26 2017 From: af5cc2 at gmail.com (John Geiger) Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:34:26 -0600 Subject: [1000mp] FS: Yaesu FT1000MP with INRAD roofing filter Message-ID: I have for sale a Yaesu FT1000MP HF radio, that does dual receive, has built in AF DSP for noise reduction, notch filtering, and bandpass filtering. It has a built in PS, built in tuner, built in keyer, and speech processor. Check out the reviews on this radio, it is a contest grade radio at a budget price. It comes with the stock 500hz CW filter, and the INRAD roofing filter to increase receiver performance. It also has the hand mic and power cord. You can read more about this model at: http://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/hamhf/ft1000mp.html It works fine and is in overall good physical condition, with no real scratches on the case. There is a little wear on the dual receive button. I am asking $800 for it plus shipping, and can take paypal/check/MO. 73 John AF5CC From cliffku4gw at gmail.com Fri Mar 3 22:48:57 2017 From: cliffku4gw at gmail.com (Cliff Fox KU4GW) Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 22:48:57 -0500 Subject: [1000mp] Subject: 1000mp Mars/CAP mod Message-ID: I have a FT-1000MP Mark V, my second one I've owned, and all you have to do to open up the transmit on all frequencies it receives on is hold down both the FAST and LOCK keys together while the radio is off and turn it on while holding them both in. Afer the radio comes on press FAST and also ENT on the number keypad and go to Menu 9-9 with the VRF/MEM CH knob and then roll your main VFO knob to change it to General. The display will read GEn 9-9 t-SELEct. No diode removal, clipping, or anything else inside the radio is needed. Very 73 de Cliff - KU4GW From rickmoskovits at gmail.com Fri Mar 10 12:06:36 2017 From: rickmoskovits at gmail.com (Rick Moskovits) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:06:36 -0400 Subject: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v Message-ID: Good afternoon to the List, I am hoping that someone can help with some questions and concerns on using the PK 232MBX with the ft1000 mp MK V Field. I am aware of the hook-up information on the older ft 1000mp but there are some changes that were made on the MK V on the digital side. So to keep it simple, is there anyone out there on the list who can provide confirmation on the safe hook up to the mk v and which connectors on the back of the mk v for RTTY and which for amtor/pactor. Thanks to all for consideration of my question. very 73 Rick Moskovits VE1RNM From ve3yv at pathcom.com Fri Mar 10 14:59:25 2017 From: ve3yv at pathcom.com (George VE3YV) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:59:25 -0500 Subject: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <00cf01d299d8$d1ecd2f0$75c678d0$@pathcom.com> Rick - digital is no problem. Use the packet jack (5-pin), not the (4-pin) "RTTY" jack which is for FSK. You may have to add a pull down resistor on the PTT line to ground for the PTT to close. IRRC 50 ohms works well, any value just high enough to not close the PTT until your interface switching transistor "closes." I use a homebrew interface so don't know if you need it for the PK232. Hope that all makes sense. GL - the Mark V is a great rig on digital modes. Please consider renewing your RAC membership and support advocating ham radio and defending our frequencies. 73, George Gorsline CG3YV International Affairs Officer Radio Amateurs of/du Canada Good afternoon to the List, I am hoping that someone can help with some questions and concerns on using the PK 232MBX with the ft1000 mp MK V Field. I am aware of the hook-up information on the older ft 1000mp but there are some changes that were made on the MK V on the digital side. So to keep it simple, is there anyone out there on the list who can provide confirmation on the safe hook up to the mk v and which connectors on the back of the mk v for RTTY and which for amtor/pactor. Thanks to all for consideration of my question. very 73 Rick Moskovits VE1RNM ______________________________________________________________ 1000mp mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rickmoskovits at gmail.com Sun Mar 12 17:49:36 2017 From: rickmoskovits at gmail.com (Rick Moskovits) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:49:36 -0300 Subject: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v In-Reply-To: <00cf01d299d8$d1ecd2f0$75c678d0$@pathcom.com> References: <00cf01d299d8$d1ecd2f0$75c678d0$@pathcom.com> Message-ID: Hi George, thanks for your email, I am certainly planning to re join RAC, I have been inactive for the last 6 or more years so with retirement am happy to join as I always enjoyed the association. thanks for your tips but think I will skip the digital and stay with ssb and cw, can't risk the mk v with no repair facility available unless you know one by any chance?? Hope we can work sometime, vy 73 Rick ve1rnm On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM, George VE3YV wrote: > Rick - digital is no problem. Use the packet jack (5-pin), not the (4-pin) > "RTTY" jack which is for FSK. You may have to add a pull down resistor on > the PTT line to ground for the PTT to close. IRRC 50 ohms works well, any > value just high enough to not close the PTT until your interface switching > transistor "closes." I use a homebrew interface so don't know if you need > it for the PK232. > > Hope that all makes sense. GL - the Mark V is a great rig on digital > modes. > > > Please consider renewing your RAC membership and support advocating ham > radio and defending our frequencies. > > 73, George Gorsline CG3YV > International Affairs Officer > Radio Amateurs of/du Canada > > Good afternoon to the List, > > I am hoping that someone can help with some questions and concerns on using > the PK 232MBX with the ft1000 mp MK V Field. > > I am aware of the hook-up information on the older ft 1000mp but there are > some changes that were made on the MK V on the digital side. So to keep it > simple, is there anyone out there on the list who can provide confirmation > on the safe hook up to the mk v and which connectors on the back of the mk > v > for RTTY and which for amtor/pactor. Thanks to all for consideration of my > question. > > very 73 Rick Moskovits VE1RNM > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From w2cdo at live.com Sun Mar 12 17:57:31 2017 From: w2cdo at live.com (Peter Alterman) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 21:57:31 +0000 Subject: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v In-Reply-To: References: <00cf01d299d8$d1ecd2f0$75c678d0$@pathcom.com>, Message-ID: Rick, Byron Campbell, WA4GEG, still repairs them. 73, Peter W2CDO Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Rick Moskovits Date: 3/12/17 10:49 PM (GMT+01:00) To: All about Yaesu 1000mp <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> Subject: Re: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v Hi George, thanks for your email, I am certainly planning to re join RAC, I have been inactive for the last 6 or more years so with retirement am happy to join as I always enjoyed the association. thanks for your tips but think I will skip the digital and stay with ssb and cw, can't risk the mk v with no repair facility available unless you know one by any chance?? Hope we can work sometime, vy 73 Rick ve1rnm On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM, George VE3YV wrote: > Rick - digital is no problem. Use the packet jack (5-pin), not the (4-pin) > "RTTY" jack which is for FSK. You may have to add a pull down resistor on > the PTT line to ground for the PTT to close. IRRC 50 ohms works well, any > value just high enough to not close the PTT until your interface switching > transistor "closes." I use a homebrew interface so don't know if you need > it for the PK232. > > Hope that all makes sense. GL - the Mark V is a great rig on digital > modes. > > > Please consider renewing your RAC membership and support advocating ham > radio and defending our frequencies. > > 73, George Gorsline CG3YV > International Affairs Officer > Radio Amateurs of/du Canada > > Good afternoon to the List, > > I am hoping that someone can help with some questions and concerns on using > the PK 232MBX with the ft1000 mp MK V Field. > > I am aware of the hook-up information on the older ft 1000mp but there are > some changes that were made on the MK V on the digital side. So to keep it > simple, is there anyone out there on the list who can provide confirmation > on the safe hook up to the mk v and which connectors on the back of the mk > v > for RTTY and which for amtor/pactor. Thanks to all for consideration of my > question. > > very 73 Rick Moskovits VE1RNM > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ 1000mp mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From scottg at n3ok.com Sun Mar 12 19:43:53 2017 From: scottg at n3ok.com (Scott Galbraith) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:43:53 -0400 Subject: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v In-Reply-To: References: <00cf01d299d8$d1ecd2f0$75c678d0$@pathcom.com> Message-ID: <40326ae0-bc81-50d0-ef67-7cd255fd1190@n3ok.com> And is excellent at it. http://www.HamRadioBug.com I highly recommend. 73, Scott N3OK On 3/12/17 5:57 PM, Peter Alterman wrote: > Rick, > Byron Campbell, WA4GEG, still repairs them. > 73, > Peter W2CDO > > > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Rick Moskovits > Date: 3/12/17 10:49 PM (GMT+01:00) > To: All about Yaesu 1000mp <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> > Subject: Re: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v > > Hi George, thanks for your email, I am certainly planning to re join RAC, I > have been inactive for the last 6 or more years so with retirement am happy > to join as I always enjoyed the association. thanks for your tips but think > I will skip the digital and stay with ssb and cw, can't risk the mk v with > no repair facility available unless you know one by any chance?? Hope we > can work sometime, vy 73 Rick ve1rnm > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM, George VE3YV wrote: > >> Rick - digital is no problem. Use the packet jack (5-pin), not the (4-pin) >> "RTTY" jack which is for FSK. You may have to add a pull down resistor on >> the PTT line to ground for the PTT to close. IRRC 50 ohms works well, any >> value just high enough to not close the PTT until your interface switching >> transistor "closes." I use a homebrew interface so don't know if you need >> it for the PK232. >> >> Hope that all makes sense. GL - the Mark V is a great rig on digital >> modes. >> >> >> Please consider renewing your RAC membership and support advocating ham >> radio and defending our frequencies. >> >> 73, George Gorsline CG3YV >> International Affairs Officer >> Radio Amateurs of/du Canada >> >> Good afternoon to the List, >> >> I am hoping that someone can help with some questions and concerns on using >> the PK 232MBX with the ft1000 mp MK V Field. >> >> I am aware of the hook-up information on the older ft 1000mp but there are >> some changes that were made on the MK V on the digital side. So to keep it >> simple, is there anyone out there on the list who can provide confirmation >> on the safe hook up to the mk v and which connectors on the back of the mk >> v >> for RTTY and which for amtor/pactor. Thanks to all for consideration of my >> question. >> >> very 73 Rick Moskovits VE1RNM >> ______________________________________________________________ >> 1000mp mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> 1000mp mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From list at jasystems.com Sun Mar 12 19:58:39 2017 From: list at jasystems.com (Jim Dawson) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 18:58:39 -0500 Subject: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v In-Reply-To: References: <00cf01d299d8$d1ecd2f0$75c678d0$@pathcom.com> Message-ID: Like Peter said, Byron Campbell, WA4GEG repairs them. He just repaired my MP. Very capable and reasonable. Jim - K9DD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Moskovits" To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 4:49 PM Subject: Re: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v > Hi George, thanks for your email, I am certainly planning to re join RAC, > I > have been inactive for the last 6 or more years so with retirement am > happy > to join as I always enjoyed the association. thanks for your tips but > think > I will skip the digital and stay with ssb and cw, can't risk the mk v with > no repair facility available unless you know one by any chance?? Hope we > can work sometime, vy 73 Rick ve1rnm > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM, George VE3YV wrote: > >> Rick - digital is no problem. Use the packet jack (5-pin), not the >> (4-pin) >> "RTTY" jack which is for FSK. You may have to add a pull down resistor >> on >> the PTT line to ground for the PTT to close. IRRC 50 ohms works well, >> any >> value just high enough to not close the PTT until your interface >> switching >> transistor "closes." I use a homebrew interface so don't know if you >> need >> it for the PK232. >> >> Hope that all makes sense. GL - the Mark V is a great rig on digital >> modes. >> >> >> Please consider renewing your RAC membership and support advocating ham >> radio and defending our frequencies. >> >> 73, George Gorsline CG3YV >> International Affairs Officer >> Radio Amateurs of/du Canada >> >> Good afternoon to the List, >> >> I am hoping that someone can help with some questions and concerns on >> using >> the PK 232MBX with the ft1000 mp MK V Field. >> >> I am aware of the hook-up information on the older ft 1000mp but there >> are >> some changes that were made on the MK V on the digital side. So to keep >> it >> simple, is there anyone out there on the list who can provide >> confirmation >> on the safe hook up to the mk v and which connectors on the back of the >> mk >> v >> for RTTY and which for amtor/pactor. Thanks to all for consideration of >> my >> question. >> >> very 73 Rick Moskovits VE1RNM >> ______________________________________________________________ >> 1000mp mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> 1000mp mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rickmoskovits at gmail.com Mon Mar 13 07:31:25 2017 From: rickmoskovits at gmail.com (Rick Moskovits) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:31:25 -0300 Subject: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v In-Reply-To: References: <00cf01d299d8$d1ecd2f0$75c678d0$@pathcom.com> Message-ID: thanks to all who replied-very much appreciated-73 Rick On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Jim Dawson wrote: > Like Peter said, Byron Campbell, WA4GEG repairs them. He just repaired my > MP. > Very capable and reasonable. > > Jim - K9DD > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Moskovits" < > rickmoskovits at gmail.com> > To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> > Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 4:49 PM > Subject: Re: [1000mp] help on using the AEA pk232 MBX with the MK v > > > Hi George, thanks for your email, I am certainly planning to re join RAC, I >> have been inactive for the last 6 or more years so with retirement am >> happy >> to join as I always enjoyed the association. thanks for your tips but >> think >> I will skip the digital and stay with ssb and cw, can't risk the mk v with >> no repair facility available unless you know one by any chance?? Hope we >> can work sometime, vy 73 Rick ve1rnm >> >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM, George VE3YV wrote: >> >> Rick - digital is no problem. Use the packet jack (5-pin), not the >>> (4-pin) >>> "RTTY" jack which is for FSK. You may have to add a pull down resistor >>> on >>> the PTT line to ground for the PTT to close. IRRC 50 ohms works well, >>> any >>> value just high enough to not close the PTT until your interface >>> switching >>> transistor "closes." I use a homebrew interface so don't know if you >>> need >>> it for the PK232. >>> >>> Hope that all makes sense. GL - the Mark V is a great rig on digital >>> modes. >>> >>> >>> Please consider renewing your RAC membership and support advocating ham >>> radio and defending our frequencies. >>> >>> 73, George Gorsline CG3YV >>> International Affairs Officer >>> Radio Amateurs of/du Canada >>> >>> Good afternoon to the List, >>> >>> I am hoping that someone can help with some questions and concerns on >>> using >>> the PK 232MBX with the ft1000 mp MK V Field. >>> >>> I am aware of the hook-up information on the older ft 1000mp but there >>> are >>> some changes that were made on the MK V on the digital side. So to keep >>> it >>> simple, is there anyone out there on the list who can provide >>> confirmation >>> on the safe hook up to the mk v and which connectors on the back of the >>> mk >>> v >>> for RTTY and which for amtor/pactor. Thanks to all for consideration of >>> my >>> question. >>> >>> very 73 Rick Moskovits VE1RNM >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> 1000mp mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> 1000mp mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >> 1000mp mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From mikep6716 at yahoo.com Thu Mar 16 17:27:35 2017 From: mikep6716 at yahoo.com (Mike Parnin) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal References: <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138@mail.yahoo.com> I have an FT1000MP / Quadra combo with an inverted L for 160 meters. I would like to use the rec out terminal for a receive only loop for 160 meters. I know how to hook it all up but am concerned about any possible RF getting back into the rig. The loop will be located 10 feet away from the inverted L and about 5 lower in height. Should I add any additional protection to the rec out terminal or will I be O.K. ?? TNX,? Mike,?? N4EPD From tboerkamp at cogeco.ca Thu Mar 16 18:07:30 2017 From: tboerkamp at cogeco.ca (Ted Boerkamp) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:07:30 -0400 Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal In-Reply-To: <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <003601d29ea1$b479cc50$1d6d64f0$@ca> Hi Mike.....my name is Ted VE3SS....I just finished setting up what you are describing for myself. I also have an original FT1000MP and I use a yaesu FL7000 solid state amp (600 watts out). I built a front end saver unit. This is what you need to protect the front end of your radio from rf Feedback. There are commercial units available or you can build one yourself. Its a simple circuit and it works!! I have my receive loop underneath my 160m inv-L due to the size of my backyard and I have participated in contests using my amp with no problems. If you don?t add this box into the equation, you are taking a lot of risk. You could accidently transmit into the loop or you get the feedback which blows up the front end of the rig. If you have any questions, feel free to reply. Good Luck with it. 73 Ted VE3SS -----Original Message----- From: 1000mp [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Parnin via 1000mp Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 5:28 PM To: 1000mp at mailman.qth.net Cc: Mike Parnin Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal I have an FT1000MP / Quadra combo with an inverted L for 160 meters. I would like to use the rec out terminal for a receive only loop for 160 meters. I know how to hook it all up but am concerned about any possible RF getting back into the rig. The loop will be located 10 feet away from the inverted L and about 5 lower in height. Should I add any additional protection to the rec out terminal or will I be O.K. ?? TNX, Mike, N4EPD ______________________________________________________________ 1000mp mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jostuts at telenet.be Fri Mar 17 14:55:24 2017 From: jostuts at telenet.be (jos tuts) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 19:55:24 +0100 Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal In-Reply-To: <003601d29ea1$b479cc50$1d6d64f0$@ca> References: <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138.ref@mail.yahoo.com><1990586596.1778448.1489699655138@mail.yahoo.com> <003601d29ea1$b479cc50$1d6d64f0$@ca> Message-ID: hey Ted .......my name is jos ON4ATK ...and I'm using also a ft1000mp . I use a beverage on receive sometimes,but am concerned about the front end. I can't find any reliable shematic on the web. any idea of what I can build on my own to protect the front end. kind regards 73 jos ON4ATK JOS TUTS MAASRODE 12 3806 VELM SINT TRUIDEN BELGIUM TEL 0032(0)11 69 28 22 -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- From: Ted Boerkamp Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 11:07 PM To: 'Mike Parnin' ; 'All about Yaesu 1000mp' Subject: Re: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal Hi Mike.....my name is Ted VE3SS....I just finished setting up what you are describing for myself. I also have an original FT1000MP and I use a yaesu FL7000 solid state amp (600 watts out). I built a front end saver unit. This is what you need to protect the front end of your radio from rf Feedback. There are commercial units available or you can build one yourself. Its a simple circuit and it works!! I have my receive loop underneath my 160m inv-L due to the size of my backyard and I have participated in contests using my amp with no problems. If you don?t add this box into the equation, you are taking a lot of risk. You could accidently transmit into the loop or you get the feedback which blows up the front end of the rig. If you have any questions, feel free to reply. Good Luck with it. 73 Ted VE3SS -----Original Message----- From: 1000mp [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Parnin via 1000mp Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 5:28 PM To: 1000mp at mailman.qth.net Cc: Mike Parnin Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal I have an FT1000MP / Quadra combo with an inverted L for 160 meters. I would like to use the rec out terminal for a receive only loop for 160 meters. I know how to hook it all up but am concerned about any possible RF getting back into the rig. The loop will be located 10 feet away from the inverted L and about 5 lower in height. Should I add any additional protection to the rec out terminal or will I be O.K. ?? TNX, Mike, N4EPD ______________________________________________________________ 1000mp mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ 1000mp mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From augie.hansen at comcast.net Fri Mar 17 15:29:28 2017 From: augie.hansen at comcast.net (Augie "Gus" Hansen) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:29:28 -0600 Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal In-Reply-To: References: <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138@mail.yahoo.com> <003601d29ea1$b479cc50$1d6d64f0$@ca> Message-ID: <283dec64-d22c-50a3-90d9-7dcd52ef45e8@comcast.net> Hi Jos, > hey Ted .......my name is jos ON4ATK ...and I'm using also a ft1000mp . > I use a beverage on receive sometimes,but am concerned about the > front end. > I can't find any reliable shematic on the web. > any idea of what I can build on my own to protect the front end. > kind regards I did a search for "RX front-end saver circuit" and it turned up many useful articles, some with schematic diagrams and parts lists, for good RX protection circuits. I have used the commercial KD9SV Front-end Saver for many years with excellent results. It provides the additional function of buffering the amp keying circuit to protect the rig from damage by amps that have high voltage or current keying requirements. There is a homebrew version of the KD9SV here: http://www.qsl.net/wy3a/Front-End-Saver.htm You need only build the part you need, so you could leave off the amp keying circuit part if your amp is of modern design (low voltage/current keying). Good luck with your project, Gus Hansen KB0YH From k2ywe at yahoo.com Fri Mar 17 17:43:45 2017 From: k2ywe at yahoo.com (Dan Z) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 21:43:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal In-Reply-To: <283dec64-d22c-50a3-90d9-7dcd52ef45e8@comcast.net> References: <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1990586596.1778448.1489699655138@mail.yahoo.com> <003601d29ea1$b479cc50$1d6d64f0$@ca> <283dec64-d22c-50a3-90d9-7dcd52ef45e8@comcast.net> Message-ID: <1909456694.2496409.1489787025947@mail.yahoo.com> It is not a problem unless you are working SO2R or Multi and have the FT1000MP in Receive mode while another rig is transmitting. ?The relay at the input of the MP's RF board de-energizes and opens the connection to the RX Ant input during transmit if the RX Ant is in use.That was not the case in the FT1000/1000D as people found out the hard way. To reiterate; Operating the MP?with a separate receive antenna where the MP is the only active transmitting device in the area antenna is not a problem. ?The RX Ant is disconnected during transmit. ?Dan Zeitlin - K2YWE South Shore ARC - K3AU Annapolis, Maryland http://danzee.org On Friday, March 17, 2017 3:56 PM, "Augie "Gus" Hansen" wrote: Hi Jos, > hey Ted .......my name is jos? ON4ATK? ...and I'm using also a ft1000mp . > I use a? beverage on receive sometimes,but am concerned about the > front end. > I can't find any reliable shematic? on the web. > any idea? of what I can build on my own to protect the front end. > kind regards I did a search for "RX front-end saver circuit" and it turned up many useful articles, some with schematic diagrams and parts lists, for good RX protection circuits. I have used the commercial KD9SV Front-end Saver for many years with excellent results. It provides the additional function of buffering the amp keying circuit to protect the rig from damage by amps that have high voltage or current keying requirements. There is a homebrew version of the KD9SV here: ? ? http://www.qsl.net/wy3a/Front-End-Saver.htm You need only build the part you need, so you could leave off the amp keying circuit part if your amp is of modern design (low voltage/current keying). Good luck with your project, Gus Hansen KB0YH ______________________________________________________________ 1000mp mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From af5cc2 at gmail.com Fri Mar 17 22:57:06 2017 From: af5cc2 at gmail.com (John Geiger) Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 21:57:06 -0500 Subject: [1000mp] FS: FT1000MP special documentation Message-ID: I have a couple of special manuals for the Yaesu FT1000MP for sale. 1. The FT1000MP Technical Supplement. This is like a mini service manual. It does contain alignment procedures and disassembly instructions. It is standard paper, about 20 pages long or so, I am asking $10 shipped for it. 2. A FT1000MP Technical Overview. This is high quality glossy paper, 46 pages long, and goes through the features and menu settings of the FT1000MP, among other things. It is definitely a great looking book. I will include the Yaesu glossy advertising brochure for the Yaesu FT1000MP with it. I am asking $20 shipped for it. I can take paypal/check/MO. 73 John AF5CC From gmguerin at voyager.net Sat Mar 18 08:32:55 2017 From: gmguerin at voyager.net (gmguerin at voyager.net) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 08:32:55 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [1000mp] [Fwd: FT1000MP Rec terminal] In-Reply-To: <1309607900.1278771.1489754447429@mail.yahoo.com> References: <12045.70.210.67.98.1489703501.squirrel@webmail.core.com> <1309607900.1278771.1489754447429@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1811.70.194.15.160.1489840375.squirrel@webmail.core.com> Hi All, One important item. The internal protection in most transceivers is not adequate. I always use an external FES with my 1000MP and previously with Icom 751a. I have a good 160 meter friend who damaged a IC765 by assuming the internal protection was adequate. So use a FES and be safe. GL 73, George, K8GG. Gary, when using your product I noticed an amp keying input. Since I use > the FT1000MP to key my Quadra would a simple tee connector and cable to > your device from the rig suffice ? Thanks for your help. > Mike,?? N4EPD > > > From: "gmguerin at voyager.net" > To: mikep6716 at yahoo.com > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:31 PM > Subject: [Fwd: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal] > > Hi Mike, > > Yes and Yes Yes.?? It is very important to isolate the RX line coming into > your transceiver from a loop or other receive antenna.?? What VE3SS said > is > very true.?? KD9SV has been making these Front End Savers or FES units for > years and sells them thru DX Engineering in Ohio.?? I have used one ever > since I put up Beverages in 1988. > > I do not know if he sells direct anymore.?? There are probably old > articles > in QST and CQ about these as well. > > Also, if you can possibly relocate the receive antenna further from the > transmit antenna it would be a great idea. > > GL,?? 73,?? George?? K8GG > > > > ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- > Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal > From:?? ?? "Mike Parnin via 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> > Date:?? ?? Thu, March 16, 2017 5:27 pm > To:?? ?? ?? "1000mp at mailman.qth.net" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> > Cc:?? ?? ?? "Mike Parnin" > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have an FT1000MP / Quadra combo with an inverted L for 160 meters. I > would like to use the rec out terminal for a receive only loop for 160 > meters. I know how to hook it all up but am concerned about any possible > RF getting back into the rig. The loop will be located 10 feet away from > the inverted L and about 5 lower in height. Should I add any additional > protection to the rec out terminal or will I be O.K. ?? > TNX,???? Mike,???????? N4EPD > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > From wd8arz at comcast.net Sat Mar 18 09:07:11 2017 From: wd8arz at comcast.net (WD8ARZ) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 09:07:11 -0400 Subject: [1000mp] Anyone experienced a bad serial port with their MP? 03/18/17 Message-ID: <24af810f-1135-3804-3d1a-7d48724b5572@comcast.net> Has any one experienced a bad serial port with their FT-1000MP? If you had this failure, what year was that failure for you? What was the activity at the time of the failure? For example was the rig powered on when connecting or disconnecting the serial cable? It was a topic of interest some years ago. Hoping that concern has not continued. Thanks - 73 from Bill - WD8ARZ -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [1000mp] RS 232 Problem Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:05:48 -0400 Reply-To: All about Yaesu 1000mp <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> To: All about Yaesu 1000mp <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> You may have a blown rs232 chip. It has been known to happen from time to time due to RFI getting in on the data cable. Last time I dug into this for someone, I suggested that when installing a replacement, use a IC socket to make the next change out easier ... hi hi Have not had that happen here, yet, but many have reported it. 73 from Bill - WD8ARZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "George" To: <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:26 AM Subject: [1000mp] RS 232 Problem > > My RS 232C port stopped working. > I have reset CPU and menus to factor-default. And tried two computers. > Thank You, - George WA4GT From af5cc2 at gmail.com Sat Mar 18 18:51:45 2017 From: af5cc2 at gmail.com (John Geiger) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:51:45 -0500 Subject: [1000mp] FS: INRAD filters for Yaesu FT1000 series, and other models Message-ID: I have the following INRAD filters for the Yaesu FT1000 series of radios for sale, and some of these fit in other Yaesu radios as well. Check the INRAD website (www.inrad.net) to determine if it will fit in your model. Here is what I have available: .. INRAD number IF Freq Bandwidth 721 455khz 500hz CW 704 455khz 250hz CW 708 8.2mhz 250hz CW .. I also have the Yaesu XF-115C 500hz CW. This is a mechanical filters. It is used in the subreceiver on the Yaesu FT1000MP/MK5 and FT2000. It can also be used in the 455khz IF of the main receiver on the FT1000D/FT1000MP/FT1000MP MK5. .. All of these filters work fine and the INRAD filters have better shape factors than the Yaesu counterparts. .. I am asking $85 shipped for each filter. New from INRAD they range from 133.25 to 174.25 plus shipping. .. 73 John AF5CC From kjones007 at bellsouth.net Sun Mar 19 19:53:40 2017 From: kjones007 at bellsouth.net (Ken Jones) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:53:40 -0400 Subject: [1000mp] [Fwd: FT1000MP Rec terminal] In-Reply-To: <1811.70.194.15.160.1489840375.squirrel@webmail.core.com> References: <12045.70.210.67.98.1489703501.squirrel@webmail.core.com> <1309607900.1278771.1489754447429@mail.yahoo.com> <1811.70.194.15.160.1489840375.squirrel@webmail.core.com> Message-ID: <3B32E27B-2556-4CCA-9FC8-B1D2C7D3078D@bellsouth.net> Please let me know if you know of anyone interested in buying a really nice Ham Radio complete with accessories. Thanks Ken Jones KK4VEH. Mobile 706-533-1550. I have a detailed add in Craigslist Augusta Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 18, 2017, at 8:32 AM, gmguerin at voyager.net wrote: > > Hi All, > > One important item. The internal protection in most transceivers is not > adequate. I always use an external FES with my 1000MP and previously > with Icom 751a. I have a good 160 meter friend who damaged a IC765 by > assuming the internal protection was adequate. So use a FES and be safe. > GL 73, George, K8GG. > > > > > Gary, when using your product I noticed an amp keying input. Since I use >> the FT1000MP to key my Quadra would a simple tee connector and cable to >> your device from the rig suffice ? Thanks for your help. >> Mike, N4EPD >> >> >> From: "gmguerin at voyager.net" >> To: mikep6716 at yahoo.com >> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:31 PM >> Subject: [Fwd: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal] >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> Yes and Yes Yes. It is very important to isolate the RX line coming into >> your transceiver from a loop or other receive antenna. What VE3SS said >> is >> very true. KD9SV has been making these Front End Savers or FES units for >> years and sells them thru DX Engineering in Ohio. I have used one ever >> since I put up Beverages in 1988. >> >> I do not know if he sells direct anymore. There are probably old >> articles >> in QST and CQ about these as well. >> >> Also, if you can possibly relocate the receive antenna further from the >> transmit antenna it would be a great idea. >> >> GL, 73, George K8GG >> >> >> >> ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- >> Subject: [1000mp] FT1000MP Rec terminal >> From: "Mike Parnin via 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> >> Date: Thu, March 16, 2017 5:27 pm >> To: "1000mp at mailman.qth.net" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net> >> Cc: "Mike Parnin" >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I have an FT1000MP / Quadra combo with an inverted L for 160 meters. I >> would like to use the rec out terminal for a receive only loop for 160 >> meters. I know how to hook it all up but am concerned about any possible >> RF getting back into the rig. The loop will be located 10 feet away from >> the inverted L and about 5 lower in height. Should I add any additional >> protection to the rec out terminal or will I be O.K. ?? >> TNX,? Mike,? ? N4EPD >> ______________________________________________________________ >> 1000mp mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> >> >> > > > ______________________________________________________________ > 1000mp mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html