[1000mp] Pro III -- FT1000MP comparison

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

Adam,

Of course it is the radio ... and it is the lack of narrow filtering
in the front end that is its biggest downfall.  However, when it comes
to DSP one can be aggressive or moderate in the settings.  I probably
should have framed it in those terms (trying to get create excessively
steep sided filters, excessive noise reduction, etc.).

I am waiting for the day that DSP and the analog rf/if amplifier
chains that feed it can provide 170 dB spurious free dynamic range.
That much is needed to handle the peak to average levels of a wide
"window" in an urban environment.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV



> -----Original Message-----
> From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Adam Farson
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 12:58 PM
> To: 'All about Yaesu 1000mp'
> Subject: RE: [1000mp] Pro III -- FT1000MP comparison
>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> << very little DSP >>
>
> The only way to use "very little DSP" on the 756Pro series is
> to power the
> radio down. The DSP *is* the radio. There is no analogue option.
>
> http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/icom/pro_dsp.html
>
> Cheers for now, 73,
> Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
>
>
>
>
>
> Scanned for viruses by Blue Coat
> http://www.WinProxy.com/
> ______________________________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>
>