[1000mp] preference question

[k5uj at mc.net]

you actually generate more heat and stress on the PA in class A with LESS power as opposed to more.

rob/k5uj

-----Original Message-----
From: hans at remeeus.nl
To: k5uj at mc.net
Sent: Mar  7, 2005 11:28 PM 
Subject: Re: [1000mp] preference question

Hello Bruce,

I owned the 1000MP for more than 2 years, the Mark-V 200 for more than 2 
years and now the Field less than 1 year.

IMHO the Field is the best choice. I did have some troubles with an 
overheated PA of the Mk-V 200. Actually the PA-finals of my Mk-V 200 blew 
out during a Class-A transmission of 25 Watts instead of 75 Watts. The Field 
seems to me much less overheated than the Mk-V 200. The 200 Watt is 'nice to 
have', but certainly not 'need to have'. The ventilator noise of the Field 
is much (!) less than that of the Mk-V 200.

Comparing the (standard) 1000MP and the Mark-V, which was the case for about 
nine months, the Mark-V wins on performance and features.

Price/Quality of these rigs is very high, when you compare them with rigs 
from others.


73,
Hans Remeeus (PA1HR)
http://www.remeeus.nl
Communication is about people, the rest is technology.


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Wade" <abcincowbay at ns.sympatico.ca>
> > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 10:13 AM
> Subject: [1000mp] preference question
>
>
> I'm looking for opinions about the following:
> Ifyou had the option of either a FT1000 MP, or an FT1000 MP Mark V,
> which would be the preferred radio to have ?
>
> rgds / Bruce / VE1NB
> ______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________
1000mp mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net