[1000mp] Sub receiver filter question

[Brian Smithson]

Hi Bruce!

I went with the 500 and I wouldn't go any narrower, personally. I find it to
be a good compromise because it's narrow enough to cut the QRM and wide
enough to help find the station the DX is working split. I went with 400's
as the 'normal' in the main receiver.

Good luck!

-Brian n8wrl

-----Original Message-----
From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Bruce Wade
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:50 AM
To: 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
Subject: [1000mp] Sub receiver filter question


Hello:
    I'm thinking of changing out an INRAD 703-C (400 hz) filter in the sub
receiver for a 704-C (250 hz) or 712-C (300 hz) filter.
    Any opinions, or expressions of experience would be appreciated

rgds / Bruce / VE1NB
______________________________________________________________
1000mp mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:1000mp at mailman.qth.net