[1000mp] mk v field

[Jim W7RY]

That's exactly it! I agree 100% with this statement below!


This is why I no longer have the 756 PRO II and now own a MK V 1000MP. I 
could not stomach the
CW audio on the PRO II. To "ringey" and sounded like the CW was going 
though a tin can.

The MK-V is much easier and cleaner to listen to!

Have you ever listened to the RX audio on a Kenwood TS-520? Nice!

73
Jim W7RY



At 11:08 PM 12/21/2004, you wrote:

>For me the 'sound of the receiver' is the most important part of a
>transceiver. All these features like IF-filters, multifunctional display,
>etcetera are very nice at the first look, but when the receiver sounds like
>a robot these features just faint away...
>
>
>73, Hans Remeeus.
>Ham Radio: PA1HR
>www.remeeus.nl
>
>Communication is about people, the rest is technology.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <n4gi at tampabay.rr.com>
>To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 1:37 PM
>Subject: Re: [1000mp] mk v field
>
>
> >
> > Everyone I know that has ProII says this to me.  For casual operating,
>FB... but listening to those DSP bleep-blop artifacts for long periods of
>time (contests) gives me an raging headache.
> >
> > Nothing can beat real crystal filters (yet).
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>1000mp mailing list
>1000mp at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp