[1000mp] Why??

[Bob Main]

OK I just looked and mine came with one (I put it in the TCXO-6 box).  I was
just told to get it and I got it and installed it before I ever plugged the
rig in.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "D. J." <dalej2 at mac.com>
To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: [1000mp] Why??


>
> On Aug 3, 2004, at 19:53, Bob Main wrote:
>
> > My Mark V didn't come with the TCXO standard, I had to buy it and then
> > remove the 26 screws to install it.
> >
> > Bob
> > KB4CL
> >
>
>
> My MKv came with a 2.0 PPM TCXO.  The optional is .5 PPM
>
> Dale, K9VUJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William Shadid" <wa9mxq at att.net>
> > To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: [1000mp] Why??
> >
> >
> >> I suspect that the MP is not up to the required level of stability and
> > that
> >> is the reason the Mark V and Mark V Field come standard with the
> >> TCXO. If
> >> you need more details, I would suggest checking the stability
> >> requirements
> >> for 60 meters and then compare the stability performance
> >> specifications of
> >> the original, stock FT-1000MP.
> >>
> >> I had an MP but moved to a Mark V so it is not an issue for me. My
> >> use of
> > 60
> >> meters has been on an older IC-751A because it has the optional TCXO.
> >>
> >> 73,
> >>
> >> -Bill, WA9MXQ
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Craig Spada" <caspada at adelphia.net>
> >> To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 03 August 2004 7:36 PM
> >> Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??
> >>
> >>
> >>> Yes they did, but the tcxo option is still available for the original
> > 857
> >>> like I have, but that does not answer the question that was asked
> > earlier,
> >>> is the frequency stability on the 1000MP without the tcxo legal on 60
> >>> meters.
> >>> Craig WA2TWF
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> >>> [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of William Shadid
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:28 PM
> >>> To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
> >>> Subject: Re: [1000mp] Why??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Didn't Yaesu add the TCXO to radios designated as "D" models? Recall
> > that
> >>> all the new radios with 60 meters included now have the suffix "D" as
> > part
> >>> of their model name.
> >>>
> >>> 73,
> >>>
> >>> -Bill, WA9MXQ
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Mike MacDonald" <mikemacd at erols.com>
> >>> To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, 03 August 2004 7:20 PM
> >>> Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Maybe so but then why is the 857 and 897 sold as
> >>>> ready for 60M? I can understand the bw but TCXO
> >>>> required??
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike WA2E
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> >>>> [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Craig Spada
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:09 PM
> >>>> To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
> >>>> Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Just so I am clear, are you stating my stock 1000MP will not be
> >>>> legal
> > on
> >>> 60
> >>>> meters because of the frequency stability??, unless I purchase the
> >> tcxo?.
> >>>> Craig WA2TWF
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> 1000mp mailing list
> >>>> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> >>>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> 1000mp mailing list
> >>> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> >>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> 1000mp mailing list
> >>> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> >>> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> 1000mp mailing list
> >> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> >> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 1000mp mailing list
> > 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
> _______________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>