[1000mp] Why??
William Shadid
wa9mxq at att.net
Tue Aug 3 21:34:42 EDT 2004
The Mark V and Mark V Field come standard with the TCXO-4. The even higher
stability TCXO-6 is optional. No optional TCXO came with the original
FT-1000MP.
73,
-Bill, WA9MXQ
-----Original Message-----
From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Bob Main
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 19:54
To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
Subject: Re: [1000mp] Why??
My Mark V didn't come with the TCXO standard, I had to buy it and then
remove the 26 screws to install it.
Bob
KB4CL
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Shadid" <wa9mxq at att.net>
To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [1000mp] Why??
> I suspect that the MP is not up to the required level of stability and
that
> is the reason the Mark V and Mark V Field come standard with the TCXO. If
> you need more details, I would suggest checking the stability requirements
> for 60 meters and then compare the stability performance specifications of
> the original, stock FT-1000MP.
>
> I had an MP but moved to a Mark V so it is not an issue for me. My use of
60
> meters has been on an older IC-751A because it has the optional TCXO.
>
> 73,
>
> -Bill, WA9MXQ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig Spada" <caspada at adelphia.net>
> To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, 03 August 2004 7:36 PM
> Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??
>
>
> > Yes they did, but the tcxo option is still available for the original
857
> > like I have, but that does not answer the question that was asked
earlier,
> > is the frequency stability on the 1000MP without the tcxo legal on 60
> > meters.
> > Craig WA2TWF
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of William Shadid
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:28 PM
> > To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
> > Subject: Re: [1000mp] Why??
> >
> >
> > Didn't Yaesu add the TCXO to radios designated as "D" models? Recall
that
> > all the new radios with 60 meters included now have the suffix "D" as
part
> > of their model name.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > -Bill, WA9MXQ
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mike MacDonald" <mikemacd at erols.com>
> > To: "All about Yaesu 1000mp" <1000mp at mailman.qth.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, 03 August 2004 7:20 PM
> > Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??
> >
> >
> > > Maybe so but then why is the 857 and 897 sold as
> > > ready for 60M? I can understand the bw but TCXO
> > > required??
> > >
> > > Mike WA2E
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: 1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > > [mailto:1000mp-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Craig Spada
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 8:09 PM
> > > To: All about Yaesu 1000mp
> > > Subject: RE: [1000mp] Why??
> > >
> > >
> > > Just so I am clear, are you stating my stock 1000MP will not be legal
on
> > 60
> > > meters because of the frequency stability??, unless I purchase the
> tcxo?.
> > > Craig WA2TWF
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > 1000mp mailing list
> > > 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 1000mp mailing list
> > 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 1000mp mailing list
> > 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
> _______________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> 1000mp at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
_______________________________________________
1000mp mailing list
1000mp at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
More information about the 1000mp
mailing list