[1000mp] going to purchase mark v

[1000mp@mailman.qth.net]

Hello Berry,

That's a good alternative for the 2800 Hz filter.

I have done quite some tests with these EDSP-settings, but most of my
ragchew friends prefered the more analogue sound of the Inrad filter without
the EDSP.


73, Hans Remeeus.
Ham Radio: PA1HR
www.remeeus.nl

Communication is about people, the rest is technology.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry N1EU" <n1eu@hotmail.com>
To: <1000mp@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: [1000mp] going to purchase mark v


> PA1HR commented "Another advantage of the 2800 Hz filter in the main
> receiver is that this filter is used by the transmitter too! It really
gives
> you a noticable better sound for ragchewing etc. This is something to
> remember."
>
> If you use EDSP on ssb-t, the crystal filter is bypassed in generating the
> xmit signal.  For ragchewing on an uncrowded band, I use 100-3100hz.
>
> I do like Inrad filters, with 5 Inrads installed in my MP.  I also like
the
> Collins 500hz mechanical filter for cw reception.
>
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
>