[1000mp] Re: 1000mp digest, Vol 4 #158 - 7 msgs
eswap
[email protected]
Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:51:26 -0500
Thanks every one.
Randy: you could be right! I will watch for CS joints also.
Jor KK4TR: LOL I am chill'n & enjoying the field.
Hans: ah so I am not the only one who notices 3 IF stages! This is my first
DSP Rig but I figured 4 IF's then the DSP.
I don't have a 1000D to comment on However I did have a FT990, the
differences in the Field & 990 where Negligible to me. I figured the Field
would hear things the 990 did not, but that was not the case for me. Just
doing A/B comparisons on the 2 rigs with a Vertical.
I did switch off / on the DSP & Tuned / Flat front end.
probably the only thing I miss on the Field is a NB that works for band
noise & the weighted VFO Knob.
thanks all
Rich kc6mmi
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 3:01 AM
Subject: 1000mp digest, Vol 4 #158 - 7 msgs
> Send 1000mp mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of 1000mp digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. MP Field (eswap)
> 2. Re: MP Field (WX5L)
> 3. Re: MP Field (Joseph Dube)
> 4. Re: MP Field ([email protected])
> 5. Sub Receiver CW Filter (Eric Castro)
> 6. Re: Sub Receiver CW Filter ([email protected])
> 7. Re: Sub Receiver CW Filter (Jim McDonald)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "eswap" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:42:05 -0500
> Subject: [1000mp] MP Field
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> afternoon every one.
> I bought my field just before the last coupons expired, and was =
> wondering if any one else at all received the Quality assurance =
> inspection sheet?=20
> I also did not receive any schematics.=20
> any one else notice that the manual makes reference to the Main VFO =
> being triple NOT Quad conversion?
> thanks
> Rich kc6mmi=20
> =20
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: WX5L <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] MP Field
> To: [email protected], <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:38:41 -0400
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> With all the recent problems like poor solder connections
> at the antenna input their quality assurance department
> may be eliminated(to help pay for the discount coupons.
>
> Randy
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:42:05 -0500
> "eswap" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >afternoon every one.
> >I bought my field just before the last coupons expired,
> >and was wondering if any one else at all received the
> >Quality assurance inspection sheet?
> >I also did not receive any schematics.
> >any one else notice that the manual makes reference to
> >the Main VFO being triple NOT Quad conversion?
> >thanks
> >Rich kc6mmi
> >
> >
> >
> >--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> >multipart/alternative
> > text/plain (text body -- kept)
> > text/html
> >The reason this message is shown is because the post was
> >in HTML
> >or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To
> >learn how
> >to post in Plain-Text go to:
> >http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
> >_______________________________________________
> >List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> >1000mp mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
>
>
> WX5L
> Thibodaux, Louisiana
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> From: "Joseph Dube" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] MP Field
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:07:40 -0400
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> The main VFO is triple and not a quad like the 1000D TS950SDX etc. The IF
> dsp more than makes up for the lose of the one IF stage. It is more than
> sensitive enough to handle any situation that may come up. Besides it has
> the preselctor circuit which most modern transistors rigs do not have
which
> makes another point in it's favor. Take a chill pill Bubba you have one
> great radio there. Just sit back and anjoy!!!!!
>
> Jor KK4TR
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "eswap" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:42 PM
> Subject: [1000mp] MP Field
>
>
> afternoon every one.
> I bought my field just before the last coupons expired, and was wondering
if
> any one else at all received the Quality assurance inspection sheet?
> I also did not receive any schematics.
> any one else notice that the manual makes reference to the Main VFO being
> triple NOT Quad conversion?
> thanks
> Rich kc6mmi
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
> _______________________________________________
> List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> 1000mp mailing list
> [email protected]
> To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.487 / Virus Database: 286 - Release Date: 6/1/03
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] MP Field
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 22:28:05 +0200
> Organization: PA1HR
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> The brochure of the FT-1000D tells me that the circuit type of the
receiver
> is a quad-conversion superheterodyne. With intermediate frequencies on
73.62
> and 8.215 MHz, 455 and 100 kHz.
>
> The manual of the FT-1000MP Mark V tells me that the circuit type of the
> main receiver is a quad-conversion superheterodyne. With intermediate
> frequencies on 70.455 and 8.215 MHz, 455 kHz. Confusing...
>
> Fig. 1-10 on page 8 of the Technical Overview (by all means an excellent,
> almost indispensible supplement of the Operating Manual) there is an
> interesting block diagram of the Mark V.
>
> Again three intermediate frequencies (70.455, 8.215, 455) and after the
4th
> local mixer the EDSP with 10.24 kHz A/D converter.
>
> Yeasu means: Quad-conversion receiver in the Mark V with the EDSP
> switched on and Triple-conversion receiver with the EDSP switched off.
>
> When I compare the FT-1000D with the FT-1000MP Mark V I notice some
> differences where the FT-1000D benefits; e.g. the receiver is more quiet.
>
> I am not able to compare the FT-1000MP Mark V Field with one of the other
> two mentioned rigs.
>
>
> 73, Hans Remeeus.
> Ham Radio: PA1HR
> www.remeeus.nl
>
> Communication is about people, the rest is technology.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Dube" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] MP Field
>
>
> > The main VFO is triple and not a quad like the 1000D TS950SDX etc. The
IF
> > dsp more than makes up for the lose of the one IF stage. It is more
than
> > sensitive enough to handle any situation that may come up. Besides it
has
> > the preselctor circuit which most modern transistors rigs do not have
> which
> > makes another point in it's favor. Take a chill pill Bubba you have one
> > great radio there. Just sit back and anjoy!!!!!
> >
> > Jor KK4TR
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "eswap" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:42 PM
> > Subject: [1000mp] MP Field
> >
> >
> > afternoon every one.
> > I bought my field just before the last coupons expired, and was
wondering
> if
> > any one else at all received the Quality assurance inspection sheet?
> > I also did not receive any schematics.
> > any one else notice that the manual makes reference to the Main VFO
being
> > triple NOT Quad conversion?
> > thanks
> > Rich kc6mmi
> >
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> From: "Eric Castro" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:56:12 -0300
> Organization: Eric de Castro - PY2EMC
> Subject: [1000mp] Sub Receiver CW Filter
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> All,
>
> I recently bought from INRAD the COLLINS 500HZ CW Filter for the
> sub-receiver.
> I installed it and enabled the menu 5.8 but did not see any difference
> on the response.
>
> I have the main receiver in CW with NAR1 enabled and when I turn the
> DUAL the reception is wide I mean without the filter.
>
> What I am doing wrong ? Want to check if I am missing something before
> open the radio again ...
>
> PS: BTW the radio is FT1k Mark-V Field.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 73's & DX
> Eric - PY2EMC
> http://www.cwsp.org.br
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] Sub Receiver CW Filter
> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 07:04:23 +0200
> Organization: PA1HR
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> Did you push SUB (the SUB display will start to blink) and afterwards NAR1
> (or NAR2)?
>
> Is the green led burning left to SUB VFO B?
>
>
> 73, Hans Remeeus.
> Ham Radio: PA1HR
> www.remeeus.nl
>
> Communication is about people, the rest is technology.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Castro" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:56 AM
> Subject: [1000mp] Sub Receiver CW Filter
>
>
> > All,
> >
> > I recently bought from INRAD the COLLINS 500HZ CW Filter for the
> > sub-receiver.
> > I installed it and enabled the menu 5.8 but did not see any difference
> > on the response.
> >
> > I have the main receiver in CW with NAR1 enabled and when I turn the
> > DUAL the reception is wide I mean without the filter.
> >
> > What I am doing wrong ? Want to check if I am missing something before
> > open the radio again ...
> >
> > PS: BTW the radio is FT1k Mark-V Field.
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> From: "Jim McDonald" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [1000mp] Sub Receiver CW Filter
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 22:09:19 -0700
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> Eric,
>
> Press the SUB button on the numeric keypad and then press either NAR1 or
> NAR2 buttons.
>
> Jim N7US
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Castro" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 7:56 PM
> Subject: [1000mp] Sub Receiver CW Filter
>
>
> All,
>
> I recently bought from INRAD the COLLINS 500HZ CW Filter for the
> sub-receiver.
> I installed it and enabled the menu 5.8 but did not see any difference
> on the response.
>
> I have the main receiver in CW with NAR1 enabled and when I turn the
> DUAL the reception is wide I mean without the filter.
>
> What I am doing wrong ? Want to check if I am missing something before
> open the radio again ...
>
> PS: BTW the radio is FT1k Mark-V Field.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 73's & DX
> Eric - PY2EMC
> http://www.cwsp.org.br
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> 1000mp mailing list
> [email protected]
> To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> 1000mp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>
>
> End of 1000mp Digest
>