[1000mp] Testing Icom vs. Yaesu

Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:12:25 -0600

... well, because everybody might buy an Icom and defect, then this =
reflector would cease to exist!

Happy New Year y'all!

73 de W9YQ
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Joe Giacobello=20
  To: [email protected]=20
  Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:05 AM
  Subject: Re: [1000mp] Testing Icom vs. Yaesu

  Why would anyone object to an objective, technically sound comparison=20
  posted to the reflector???!!!

  73, Joe

  wjdiamond wrote:

  >I should be able to shed some light between the Pro, PRO II
  >and the 1000MP shortly as I am now evaluating the operation of
  >the MP vs. the Icom rigs.
  >
  >I have been told by many to keep my opinions off the reflector
  >and not to post any results so to avoid the flak, I will post
  >the full results on my web page and let the chips fall where
  >they may.
  >
  >I may make a brief announcement that they are now listed but
  >the results will not be listed here.
  >
  >   William J. Diamond (Bill)
  >     Rogers, Arkansas USA
  >    [email protected]
  >
  >
  >    Ham Radio Operator WR0T
  >Please Visit My Radio Page revised 12-20-03
  >http://pages.sbcglobal.net/wjdiamond/index.html
  >
  >
  >_______________________________________________
  >List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
  >1000mp mailing list
  >[email protected]
  >To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
  >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
  >
  >
  > =20
  >

  _______________________________________________
  List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
  1000mp mailing list
  [email protected]
  To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment.  Attachments are not allowed.  To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html  ---