[1000mp] Fw: Hi-Fi SSB and the application of the law - Cross Post

Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:22:15 -0600

I know this is off topic and I'll keep quiet after this one more post 
but the question is burning my brain for an answer.

What are the qualifications needed to be a OO?  Can just anyone be an 
OO?  If thats the case this may be a bit scarry situation especially 
if one person does not approve of anothers mode or operation even 
though it's perfectly legal.

Ok, thats it for me, I'll shut up now and enjoy the holiday. 
Everyone else do the same.

Dale J.

>In two other recent instances, a Florida OO has allegedly been issuing
>warnings with the comment "excessive bandwidth."  As I understand it, three
>actions from an OO, is an invitation to have the issue routed up the chain
>of command directly to the Commission. 
>
>73,
>
>-Paul
>FN16 - 47 CFR 97.307(a).
>
>FN17 - P. Rinaldo, W4RI, "Is Digital Voice Permissible
>under Part 97?" sidebar to C. Brain,
>G4GUO, and A. Talbot, G4JNT, "Practical HF
>Digital Voice," QEX/Communications Quarterly,
>May/Jun 2000. The article may be
>found on ARRLWeb, www.arrl.org/tis/info/
>digivoice.html. "The Help Desk," elsewhere
>in this issue, contains an updated list of HF
>band plans.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
>1000mp mailing list
>[email protected]
>To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp