[1000mp] Separate Reflector?...maybe...

[email protected] [email protected]
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:28:57 EST


My vote (as if it matters ) is yes....seperate would be Great and I am all 
for it........BUT ...it seems as though the gentlemen with the most 
experience/knowledge and the best help for others  with the MP have switched 
to MK V or have both rigs.......or just have the MK V  and WISH they had the 
original MP back....;o)           I just wonder if all these Guru's would 
support and join a seperate MP (original) Reflector because as it seems as of 
late this is a MK V ref.?

Myself ...I do not ever plan on owning and do not want the MKv...(I may 
however buy another old fashioned MP)..and loved the old and outdated MP 
ref....( Why is it that "new and improved" ain't as good as old and 
outdated?)all these posts lately and for some time have been all abt the MK  
V....and I am on my 3rd delet key on this keyboard!........(Thanks to all 
that put reference to MK V in the subject line so I can dump before opening)

I bought my MP in 96 and it went to Yeasu b4 1 year for its chk up....all 
was/is fine....the Vol. pot was replaced then as it was noisey but it has 
been flawless since.....seems the oldest and original MP's were the most 
trouble free....and when I get my spare I will look for an early Ser. 
Number.....  

Sorry for living in the past and I am grateful for all the help rec'd from 
reading posts (from the old) reflector abt the MP ....I would at times have 
been lost without the info obtained here....it contains a wealth of 
information....But maybe it IS  time for a little change.

Interesting question here....I wonder the ratio of MP(original) only owners 
to 
MK V/MP owners  that wish a seperate list?........(agn not that it 
matters)...Seems the old MPers are outnumbered by the ammount of (MK 
Vers)posts read here tonite...any hoo....just my views and opinion....(its 
nice to have these!)

73

Mike W2GR