[1000mp] Separate Reflector?...maybe...
[email protected]
[email protected]
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 18:28:57 EST
My vote (as if it matters ) is yes....seperate would be Great and I am all
for it........BUT ...it seems as though the gentlemen with the most
experience/knowledge and the best help for others with the MP have switched
to MK V or have both rigs.......or just have the MK V and WISH they had the
original MP back....;o) I just wonder if all these Guru's would
support and join a seperate MP (original) Reflector because as it seems as of
late this is a MK V ref.?
Myself ...I do not ever plan on owning and do not want the MKv...(I may
however buy another old fashioned MP)..and loved the old and outdated MP
ref....( Why is it that "new and improved" ain't as good as old and
outdated?)all these posts lately and for some time have been all abt the MK
V....and I am on my 3rd delet key on this keyboard!........(Thanks to all
that put reference to MK V in the subject line so I can dump before opening)
I bought my MP in 96 and it went to Yeasu b4 1 year for its chk up....all
was/is fine....the Vol. pot was replaced then as it was noisey but it has
been flawless since.....seems the oldest and original MP's were the most
trouble free....and when I get my spare I will look for an early Ser.
Number.....
Sorry for living in the past and I am grateful for all the help rec'd from
reading posts (from the old) reflector abt the MP ....I would at times have
been lost without the info obtained here....it contains a wealth of
information....But maybe it IS time for a little change.
Interesting question here....I wonder the ratio of MP(original) only owners
to
MK V/MP owners that wish a seperate list?........(agn not that it
matters)...Seems the old MPers are outnumbered by the ammount of (MK
Vers)posts read here tonite...any hoo....just my views and opinion....(its
nice to have these!)
73
Mike W2GR