[1000mp] System gain in the 1000MP station
Tom Rauch
[email protected]
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:27:10 -0500
> > IMO it would be pretty rare condx when 1 S unit would
> > even be noticeable, much less make a difference in bagging a QSO.
Even 1dB makes a very large difference in readability when signals
are near noise or QRM levels.
> receiver. Now, 6 dB may not mean much when the band is wide open but
> 6 dB will put you right on top of a pileup when you otherwize were
> just part of the masses. In fact 1 or 2 dB may do the same. And
> assuming the rest of the system is reasonable (already have a decent
> antenna, decent coax) $600 for 6 dB is a lot of bang for the buck
It sure is! Especially on low bands, where 6dB extra antenna
performance costs big big dollars in resources!
Even on higher bands, six dB is a tremendous improvement under
marginal conditions of any type, be it QRM, noise, or just plain
weak signals.
I think part of the confusion is people incorrectly assume the
absolute signal to noise level change reflects directly in a
readability change of a similar amount.
It does not work that way, and even amounts *less* than one dB
can be the difference between making and not making a QSO.
Another possible contribution to the rumor that a few dB makes no
difference comes from watching S meters, and assuming hey are
correct. The S meters on our rigs are almost certainly neither
linear nor accurately calibrated to some sort of a dB standard. So
what you see might not even come close to what is really
happening.
My FT1000D for example, while fairly close around S-7 or higher, is
about one or two dB per S unit down below S-5. This is a normal
characteristic of most rigs. My IC751A's, when calibrated
according to factory alignment, average 4dB per S unit, and are
around 1dB per S unit below S3. Collins, Drake, and other
companies shot for around 5dB per S unit, but because of AGC
characteristics have the same problem with scale non-linearity as
modern rigs.
The end result of that is if I see an S-2 station increase to S-3, and
observe a large difference in readability (which I typically do) I might
assume it was from a 6dB change in level. In fact, it was probably
a 2dB or less change in level!
Another myth is an "X" db improvement in transmitting antenna
gain results in the same improvement in receiving. That isn't true
either, because when the system limits on external noise or QRM
only directivity (not gain) improves S/N ratio. A lower gain antenna
always will improve S/N when it has a better null towards
interference or noise, even if it has much less gain.
The end result of all of this is once you get past having a
reasonably decent modest-cost antenna system, the next big bang
for the buck is more power.
73, Tom W8JI
[email protected]