[1000mp] Re: Inrad Filters
Mike Schatzberg
[email protected]
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:45:04 -0500
Hello Rick...Please let me know if they actually can make a difference =
with weak signals....the signal to noise ratio is a big problem with me, =
and I am worried that the 1.8 might be too tight.....can you really work =
the very weak stations?.....Let me know your opinion here....I see Inrad =
makes an IF amp modification kit to improve the noise situation, and =
maybe you need this too, to really use the 1.8 filters.....
Thanks for your help,
Regards,
Mike
WB2AJI
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Rick Kourey, K4KL=20
To: [email protected]=20
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:08 PM
Subject: Inrad Filters
Mike,=20
Before I would consider buying the 2.0 KC Inrad filters, I would look =
at the Inrad 1.8 KC filters.
Like you, I did not think the 2.0 KC Yaesu filters were tight enough =
in QRM conditions to make a significant difference for me
I just purchased (but not installed yet) the Inrad 1.8 KC filters =
which you might consider. They tighten down the bandpass in the worst =
of conditions and make copy possible. Obvioulsy these tight filters =
will not deliver high fidelity but I never put them in line unless I am =
experiencing the worst of SSB QRM.
Rick Kourey, K4KL
Charlotte, NC
[email protected]
Hello Yaesu Fans.....
I have installed the 2nd and 3rd IF crystal 2.0 khz filters from =
Yaesu, and must admit I am disappointed.....
Between the noise and I guess the shape factor of these units, it is =
extremely difficult to copy weak signals......the interference reduction =
is not impressive either.....
Do the Inrad 2.1 filters work better?.....Shall I try to return the =
stock 2.0 filters and obtain the Inrad?.....
Thanks for your input.....
Mike Schatzberg
WB2AJI
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---