[1000mp] Test IMD vs actual IMD
Tom Rauch
[email protected]
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:36:15 -0400
> In fact the IMD products that are created by a voice signal going
> through the
> transmitter are far worse than the industry standard two tone test.
> This is because there are many simultaneous tones within the voice
> spectrum. All of component tones are capable of producing intermod
> products with every other one.
The major reason I have found voice signals are worse is because they
vary at a syllabic rate. The very low-frequency components change
power supply loading of bias and main power sources, and make the
supplies "waddle" all around.
Any test that steadily loads the supply with a high frequency load,
such as two tones spaced 2 kHz or a notch-noise test, misses most
dynamic power supply problems because bypass capacitors can hold up
the supply voltage through their energy storage capabilities and mask
low frequency dynamic regulation problems.
Another misconception is the idea reducing power output always
improves the IMD when expressed in dB down from mean output. That
simply is not true. Many systems have worse IM performance at very
low power than they do at full power, mostly these problems come from
from biasing errors.
73, Tom W8JI
[email protected]