[1000mp] QST Product Reviews whitewash

Garry Shapiro [email protected]
Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:25:25 -0000


Jeffrey:

Your exchange with Ed is degenerating. "Fire words" can only have a negative
result, here.

Garry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Pawlan
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 15:15
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: [1000mp] QST Product Reviews whitewash
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Hare,Ed, W1RFI wrote:
>
> > > Even if we take the QST whitewash method of specing IMD
> > > relative to PEP output
> > > which makes it appear as 6dB better:
> >
> > Jeffrey,
> >
> > It is not a "whitewash."
> >
> > Do you intend to be so insultive?
> >
>
>
> Dear Ed,
>
>   You are overreacting to my opinion. It is my opinion that making the IMD
> measurement appear 6dB better is a form of whitewash. As I previously very
> respectfully stated, I would never report IMD to one of my
> customers in that
> manner, nor have I ever seen it reported that wasy in any
> commercial publication
> or engineering book.
>
> 73,
>
> Jeffrey Pawlan, WA6KBL
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List Moderator: Richard Lubash N1VXW
> 1000mp mailing list
> [email protected]
> To Change Options or Unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/1000mp
>