[1000mp] QST Product Reviews whitewash
Joe Subich, K4IK
[email protected]
Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:47:41 -0400
> your forgetting , Yaesu , Icom , kenwood are major advertising income
> for qst. there not going to bite the hand that feed them !!!
Actually, I am not ...
Products have been slammed before - even products from major vendors -
and the vendor has fixed the problem or developed a better replacement.
If the product review process had a clear and reasonable standard of
expected performance, I suspect Yaesu, Icom, Kenwood, etc. would make
every effort to market products that would meet the standard.
Over the last few years standards product reviews have done a great
deal to improve receiver MDS, dynamic range and phase noise issues.
However, there hasn't been the came attention to detail when it comes
to transmit characteristics. Thus we now have transmitted IMD as bad
as -18 dB (based on the commercial standard) and significant key click
problems with most of the rigs on the market (even the high dollar
rigs like the FT-1000D, MK-V, high end Icoms, etc.).
It is time for the product review process to expect the same level
of performance from transmitters as receivers. Features are nice
but they should not come at the expense of basic performance!
73,
... Joe, K4IK